SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: PROLIFE who wrote (736226)4/10/2006 10:17:23 AM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
I've suggested for a long time now that 1/2 TRILLION DOLLARS should be our upper limit for Iraq spending.

(Cost measured against potential gain, don't 'cha know.)

And, we are rounding on that financial number this year, so I believe --- also since we have ACHIEVED *all* of our original objectives... Saddam is on trial for his like, Iraqis have an elected government, and there is no WMD threat toi the US from Iraq --- that it is much in America's interest to end the occupation now, and let the Iraqis settle their own internal political issues.

(Also, since a war in the region between fundamentalist Sunnis and fundamentalist Shiites, even drawing from neighboring nations such as Saudi Arabia and Syria and Iran is likely historically inevitable, but even more importantly, *necessary* for the political evolution of the region... and is ALSO in the best long-term interests of the West and America... I see no reason to waste further American money or blood in futilely trying to stave-off what is actually in our OWN BEST INTERESTS.)

It's just STUPID to shoot ourselves in the foot like that.