Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: paret who wrote (184948)	4/11/2006 9:21:33 AM
From: paret	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Interesting that Jackson is more worried about what Bush could do to Iran than what Iran could do to us. Easy to see whose side you're on, Jackson.

To: paret who wrote (184948)	4/11/2006 12:03:56 PM
From: KLP	Respond to of 281500

Maybe Iran will visit Jessie first....

To: paret who wrote (184948)	4/11/2006 12:53:08 PM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

<Iran has oil and gas -- lots of it, second only to Saudi Arabia in reserves.> Yet even right here in SI, people, such as Geode, can't understand that that means they don't need a nuclear reactor to generate electricity, especially if they are going to build a gas pipeline thousands of miles long, across potentially hostile countries, at a cost of $billions, when they could build that pipeline to a thermal power station locally to generate the electricity that the nuclear reactor would produce. It fascinates me how such a short chain of logic bamboozles some people, namely Geode, and they really do seem to believe the Iranians that their nuclear power station is for peaceful purposes. I suppose they have learned from the Pentagon, which called a military rocket "Peacemaker". Big Brother does that; see "1984". Mqurice