Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Canadian Political Free-for-All -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ichy Smith who wrote (9190)	4/11/2006 10:23:47 PM
From: Cogito Ergo Sum	Respond to of 37241

LOL.. I think the point would be made much faster by stopping oil... Can't see how the softwood would even come close... Stopping the oil would take REALLY BIG balls (For those with a sense of humour... spots.kicks-ass.org ) Wood... schmoood... that's for weenies... Like whores Canadians sell whatever they can to whoever wants it. That's capitalism... Are you arguing two points Ichy ? I dunno... is capitalism wrong ? Maybe stopping the oil sale would be less whorish and more principled... .. and control... we do not need to own it... just use export duty... are we not sovereign ? (nukes would sure help ... see!!) ownership is for wusses... just like abiding by free trade deals ... or should we not expect that :O) BTW on smugness you are barking up the wrong tree here... I've complained countless times and on this very thread... that we Canucks have not that much to be so smug about... It's better here.. but it'll be work to keep it that way... Al