To: combjelly who wrote (283883 ) 4/12/2006 9:19:33 AM From: GUSTAVE JAEGER Respond to of 1572658 Re: The US isn't a monoculture either. Message 21801947 Re: Have you seen "Schultze Gets the Blues"? No. I guess it's essential that we first agree on what exactly is "culture" before proceeding any further.... Of course, in a folksy, exotic, sense, the US can boast of dozens of different "cultures". We can even think of the dozen different religious denominations as belonging to as many different "cultures". Things look different, however, as we climb up the US power structure: whether at the local level (mayors, governors, state legislatures,...) or at the federal one (US Congress, the White House, US Supreme Court, the military,...), US power elites are overwhelmingly monocultural. Whatever their ethnic background --African like Powell and Rice, Hispanic like Gonzales, Chinese like Elaine L. Chao, or Japanese like Mineta-- all US elites speak English, are Christian (or Jewish), watch the same big TV networks, read the same newspapers (NYT, WPost,...) and get their kick out of NFL, NBA,... games. Therefore, unlike their European counterparts, US elites make up a much, much more homogeneous caste. European elites can't even communicate --that is, chat and banter-- with each other without a translator!! You can see pictures and footages of Jacques Chirac welcoming Angela Merkel at the gate of the Elysée Palace, both hilarious and talkative... but the truth is that they can't engage in any meaningful chatter without their translators' help. It's even worse in Belgium where only very recently, prominent Walloon politicians have pledged to learn some Dutch, the country's majority language! I guess that's why European elites failed to agree on a common constitution in 2004..... Gus