Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: longnshort who wrote (736496)	4/12/2006 10:37:35 AM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

HaHaHaHaHaHa!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You are saying that Saddam is qualified to run for American President... but ARHNOLD isn't? <GGG> Yah think a little thing like MASS MURDER might qualify as a 'felony' and serve to disqualify him? (Ah well, he's well past his 'use by' date. Guess he should have resigned as Dictator some decades ago, emigrated to the ole US of A, and entered politics back when he could still count on introductions from Reagan and Rummie. Likely a bit HARD to raise campaign contributions now, and in American politics, it's ALL about the benjamins. :)

To: longnshort who wrote (736496)	4/12/2006 11:38:10 AM
From: CYBERKEN	Respond to of 769670

Red head rags and wild eyes dept: We are used to seeing insane anti-globalization/anti-capitalist/enviro-whacko spoiled rich kids from liberal families stinking up the streets whenever the media is willing to flip on the cameras (indeed, they are the main pillar of the global warming cult.) It's the "Woodstock" of our era. But CONSERVATIVES have now joined this mentally-deficient crowd as a result their hate for the emerging Hispanic middle class. Watching them chanting on TV that the "big corporations" support immigration "just to exploit cheap labor" makes even CYBERKEN ashamed of being a conservative. A refreshing view from the right is Charles Krauthammer's take on the whole issue. Build any wall necessary to control access to the US, BUT combine that with assimilation of the millions who have already arrived without regard for the red herring of, "But they broke our LAWS." Certain media conservatives would be well-advised to take a week or so off and give it some THOUGHT...

To: longnshort who wrote (736496)	4/12/2006 11:44:56 AM
From: CYBERKEN	Respond to of 769670

In the meantime, the Leninist revisionists are making a partial comeback-ala the Vietnam backstab-against the war with subhuman Islam. That's mostly because so many conservatives-the MAINSTAYS against the anti-American domestic enemy for that last several years-are too busy foaming at the mouth over THEM STANKIN MEXKINS, who "broke the law" to git in here. As George Patton said in December, 1944, "We can still LOSE this war."...