Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Technical analysis for shorts & longs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Johnny Canuck who wrote (43235)	4/13/2006 8:50:50 PM
From: Johnny Canuck	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 68216

RFID vulnerable to attacks, researchers say By Tom Espiner news.com.com Story last modified Thu Apr 13 16:09:51 PDT 2006 Researchers say they have proven that effective attacks can be launched against radio frequency identification tags. In tests, standard "Generation 1" RFID tags and readers were unable to function after they were overloaded with data, researchers at Edith Cowan University in Perth, Australia, said in a report published this month. "Vulnerabilities in the newer UHF style of RFID tags have been found and are of concern for anyone trying to implement an RFID system that would have 'mission critical' or human life issues involved in it," warned academics in the SCISSEC research group at the university. Although many companies are testing RFID tagging in their supply chain, the tags are not commonly used in life-critical situations. However, the tags are used by the U.S. military to track supplies. "Generation 2" standard RFID tags could also be disrupted, according to the researchers. Generation 2 tags are more sophisticated than Generation 1 tags, and can operate at four different speeds. RFID relies on tags being identified by readers when they are within range. Readers communicate with the tags by hopping between a number of channels within an allocated band of frequencies. It was thought this provided security because the reader could hop between frequencies when encountering interference. In other news: AOL charged with blocking e-mail Filmmakers flock to the Net Newsmaker: Bringing free software to the masses News.com Extra: Tech's new headache: Feature creep Video: Google wants to keep your calendar In the tests, the Australian researchers saturated the frequency range used by the tags, which prevented the tags from talking to the readers. The Australian researchers said in their report that the use of frequency hopping would not stop denial-of-service attacks, as the tags themselves could not hop frequencies. They demonstrated that from a range of about 3 feet, they could disrupt communications between tags and readers, putting the tag into a "communication fault state." While the readers can hop frequencies in the allocated band range if they encounter interference, RFID tags cannot, as they regard the entire band as one channel. Last month, Dutch researchers announced the successful creation of a virus capable of infecting RFID tags. Tom Espiner of ZDNet UK reported from London.