Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : FREE AMERICA -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: goldworldnet who wrote (3272)	4/12/2006 12:40:09 PM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14758

When i took a law class in college ages ago, we discussed this in light of what then seemed like a loophole too. Pregnant gals would come to the country in their 9th month just to have the baby here. Eventually moms and dads got to stay. Seems silly to be different than the rest of the world in this regard.

To: goldworldnet who wrote (3272)	4/12/2006 12:46:03 PM
From: michael97123	Respond to of 14758

My point is that we have to deal with illegals in the country already one way but change the citizenship rules so the next gen of illegals cant use the argument that our kids are citizens. This is the way it is all over the world. I dont know of another country who grants citizenship based on geography of birth. It was orignially done to increase immigration way back when, but now over immigration is a problem with mexico and resolution is necessary. I am not asking for citizenship to be reversed for anyone who has already been born here.