Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : LFWK - Loftwerks Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: angela943490 who wrote (149)	4/16/2006 11:52:48 AM
From: jmhollen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 363

As mergers go, it seems to be moving right along to me. And, I believe this is a two-step process (..double merger..) which would tend to take a day or two longer than a simple 1:1 get together. Although I started this Board, I have turned it over to rruff as he is one of the Guru's on the subject. I do have an old, well-heeled SI compadre' that brought LFWK to my attention. Both rrufff and Creede Bighorns, who post here, are some of the better DD'rs around the OTCBB/Pink/Gray block and Patricia is also following/owning LFWK I believe. Hence, I'm happy with the stash I have, even though I was a late entry. Consultech and the Sulja Brothers are both very successful companies and readily locatable on the WWW, so we're certainly not dealing with any unknown quantities here. Since LFWK is neither located in slimy South Florida (..or Kaleephonya..) nor has any interests there to date. The projected numbers seem quite attractive. So, I think your anxiety is either unfounded or should be attributed to the bad press I'm sure you've received about Pinks in general. You might want to add some NDOL, AURC, and perhaps some RSHN to your "..non-Snob Stock.." portfolio using an appropriate sum of "..Casino Money Only.." to give you a little broader perspective on some Pinks that have the portential to do quite well. Please read and make use of the PM I'm sending you on the subject. It should save you a great deal of "..learning curve.." time. John :-) .

To: angela943490 who wrote (149)	4/16/2006 12:23:27 PM
From: jmhollen	Respond to of 363

OBTW: ..There is known to be a sizable short and/or Naked Short position against LFWK. That appears to lead to some "..back door.." influence with the people at Pinksheets.com. The MFMMMs, Hedgies, broker-dealer-manipulators, and their associated shorting scum seem to be able to influence the people at Pinksheets.com when it comes to getting these companies both harassed and then re-quoted. pinksheets.com When the shorts and illegal Naked Shorts get squeezed out of LFWK, eveyone's shares should make a rather impressive positive move. As the merger completes, and all of the associated filings get sifted through once again by the foot-draggers at 'mafia.com', LFWK will be providing us Real Time Quotes and the Level-II MFMMM display on their system. It costs an extra $300/month to have the RTQs & L-II, so that is at least an indicator that a company gives a rat's tush about their stockholders, IMHO. John :-) ps: Here is an example of a Pinksheet company with RTQs & L-II: pinksheets.com .

To: angela943490 who wrote (149)	4/16/2006 1:14:04 PM
From: rrufff	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 363

Angela - to expound upon John's posts, think of it as a giant 3D chess game with several players. Each player tries to think about 6 steps ahead of time. You have most of us who want the share price to increase, retail shareholders, insiders and management. You have others that are negotiating their interests in the revised entity, like partners and finance people. Then you have those who may want the price to fall, MM's and possible shorters. Factor in "legal time," which is often defined in amorphous terms and you have ample reasons why mergers take longer to close and disclosures come out piece meal. Bottom line is that the company has put a lot of things in writing that aren't normally done in pinkie land. The ownership by insiders of more than the legal float, possible dividend and projections of revenues, if honest and true, should support a multi-bagger gain. All JMHO.