Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : YEEHAW CANDIDATES -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Galirayo who wrote (17388)	4/17/2006 12:30:31 AM
From: PuddleGlum	Respond to of 23958

So .. you are beginning to like my 144 .. Fibo Numerical ?? Not exactly... maybe funnin' with you a bit more. Fib numbers are not magical, though they make a nice net with that 62% increase most of the way through the sequence. But even E-wave's foundation isn't on the 62% figure. It's on Fib #'s 1 and 5. The entire wave cycle is half of a period of one large oscillator, while the pullbacks are part of another oscillator with a frequency 5 times the large oscillator. The little one has 2.5 cycles while the big one does its half cycle. That's my take, anyway. Even before I noticed that I tended to use MA's that increased by 4-5 times. So, I use 9MA, 42, and 189 (sometimes). If 144 is your long MA then your next lower one should be around 30-38 (will 34 do?). HLIT looks somewhat better using 2% box size, though still has a triple bottom break. I get the feeling that P&F isn't representing the situation as well as it should in HLIT's case: stockcharts.com[PA][D][F1!3!2.0!!2!20]&pref=G