Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Israel to U.S. : Now Deal with Syria and Iran -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sea_urchin who wrote (10724)	4/16/2006 9:02:30 PM
From: philv	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 22250

"The world community does not want them to have that nuclear know-how and that's why nobody wants them to be able to enrich and reprocess on their territory, getting to the place that they can produce what we call a full-scale nuclear plant to be able to do this," she said. I don't know if you caught it, but two or three days ago, Bush was on the TV saying that the US doesn't want a nuclear Iran, or an Iran with nuclear production capability, or even with nuclear "knowledge". So Bush/Rice have the administration message down pat, and they both are singing from the same song book. Preventing knowledge conjures up images of past attempts at book burning etc. I take it from some previous subtle comments you made that Rice is not your favourite. No doubt you remember what Zhirinovsky said about her? " "If she has no man by her side at her age, he will never appear," Zhirinovsky said. "Condoleezza Rice needs a company of soldiers. She needs to be taken to barracks where she would be satisfied." " "Condoleezza Rice is a very cruel, offended woman who lacks men's attention," he added. "Such women are very rough. ? They can be happy only when they are talked and written about everywhere: 'Oh, Condoleezza, what a remarkable woman, what a charming Afro-American lady! How well she can play the piano and speak Russian!' "Complex-prone women are especially dangerous. They are like malicious mothers-in-law, women that evoke hatred and irritation with everyone. Everybody tries to part with such women as soon as possible. A mother-in-law is better than a single and childless political persona, though."" But maybe I am wrong, and you secretly admire her, because I remember reading something which you wrote about her baring her teeth or something like that. (I will look it up if you insist). Does that mean you think she is a real tiger? Or maybe a little pussy cat? Perhaps there is more than just "admiration" there??