SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : John Pitera's Market Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jon Koplik who wrote (7326)4/18/2006 9:27:16 AM
From: robert b furman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 33421
 
Hi Jon,

Sounds like a set up for the nimble hedges to fleece the newer positional traders.

They call it backwardation.

when things get topped off and the offloading platforms are backed up out in the gulf - I've no doubt that future prices will collapse.

Yesterdays significant pop leaves me to think that may just happen sooner than later.

@.75 -3.00 dollar gas will create demand destruction and that met with new ethanol supply coming onstream will collapse the house of cards quickly.

It appears there is now enough money at risk,that the weight of its own being will cause the collapse.

Lets hope it rolls into equities as Real Estate seems to be cooling.

Bob



To: Jon Koplik who wrote (7326)6/5/2006 11:38:56 PM
From: Jon Koplik  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 33421
 
WSJ -- Saudis Cite Market Forces For Lower Crude Output ........................

[Sure sounds to me as if we should start our plunge in oil prices soon. Somewhere between $10 and $35 is my guess for where we go next. Jon.]

**************************************************************

June 5, 2006

Saudis Cite Market Forces For Lower Crude Output

Kingdom Denies Any Effort To Curb Global Oil Supply; Stores Are Near Capacity

By BHUSHAN BAHREE

CARACAS, Venezuela -- Saudi Arabia's oil minister confirmed that his country's massive crude-oil output has declined in recent months, but he attributed the trend to a drop in demand and denied the kingdom is aiming to limit supply.

In an interview after a meeting here of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, Ali Naimi said other cartel members are having trouble finding buyers for all the crude they are producing, at a time when global stores are near full and many refiners have closed facilities for routine maintenance. One Saudi official said an estimated three million barrels a day of refining capacity is out of action and unable to process crude, at a time when the world is using some 84 million barrels a day of oil products like gasoline and jet fuel.

"It's not just heavy oil. Even light oil is having problems" finding buyers, Mr. Naimi said, referring to premium grades of crude known as light crude that are highly prized by refiners because they have high gasoline yields.

Asked if the kingdom was easing up on supply because of concern about the buildup of inventories in the U.S. and other importing countries, Mr. Naimi rejected such a motive, replying: "At $70 a barrel?" Mr. Naimi suggested that producers will sell all the oil they can at such high prices.

The implication of Mr. Naimi's remarks is that Saudi Arabia would again open its oil spigots when buyers ask for more oil. For the past two years, the Saudis say, their policy has been to sell as much oil as buyers want, to the limit of the kingdom's production capacity.

U.S. benchmark crude for July delivery settled at $72.33 a barrel, up $1.99, on the New York Mercantile Exchange Friday. So far in 2006, crude oil is up $11.29 a barrel, or 18%, and the price has more than doubled since the end of 2003 due to rising global demand and supply constraints.

The Saudi minister said the kingdom's oil output fell to 9.1 million barrels a day in April, the most recent figures available. Saudi output averaged nearly 9.5 million barrels a day in the first quarter, according to data compiled by the International Energy Agency.

The Saudi oil czar shrugged off concerns about large inventories, a trend that some in OPEC have cited as warranting a cutback in production. Mr. Naimi said producers must focus not only on stockpiles but also on spare oil-pumping capacity world-wide. Because there is little extra oil that exporters can produce, oil held in inventories can act as a cushion against supply disruptions.

But he ruled out the idea of Saudi Arabia discounting its oil to sell more barrels. "We will not leave money on the table" for others, Mr. Naimi said.

Saudi Arabia prices its oil according to a formula that takes into account prevailing prices on futures markets and on refinery margins -- or the difference between the price of crude and the price of crude-based fuels -- in different regions. It adjusts prices monthly for America, Europe and Asia. Many other exporting countries follow the kingdom's lead. OPEC's members assert that by basing prices on futures markets and on refining margins, they in effect let markets set the price of their oil.

With prices near a nominal high -- though still shy of highs reached in the early 1980s when adjusted for inflation -- OPEC's ministers on Thursday brushed aside a proposal by Venezuela to trim output and decided to maintain current output quotas totaling 28 million barrels a day, excluding Iraq.

OPEC and industry officials say the cartel's output is currently below that. In part that is because of supply shortfalls in Nigeria, whose production has been hobbled by political violence. But cartel officials say the production shortfall is also because Saudi Arabia and others in the cartel are encountering problems selling oil. Buyers have cut back purchases from other exporters, including Iran and the United Arab Emirates.

Iran's response has been to keep pumping oil and storing it, some of it in tankers, while it looks for buyers on the spot market. Some industry estimates put the oil Iran has stored in the past six weeks or so at more than 20 million barrels.

A senior Iranian oil official attending the OPEC meeting confirmed that his country, OPEC's second-largest oil producer after Saudi Arabia, was having trouble selling heavy oil and was storing it. But he didn't specify the volumes involved.

In contrast, Saudi Arabia has reduced output to match demand for its crude. Saudi Arabia sells oil exclusively under long-term contracts with buyers that have some latitude in deciding how much crude to take every month at the prices specified by the kingdom. "We don't sell on the spot market," Mr. Naimi said.

Write to Bhushan Bahree at bhushan.bahree@wsj.com

Copyright © 2006 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



To: Jon Koplik who wrote (7326)6/13/2006 10:58:45 PM
From: Jon Koplik  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 33421
 
WSJ says IEA says : "developed nations' crude-oil stocks are at a 20-year high" ............................

[See part in bold print, below. Jon.]

-------------------------------------------------

June 14, 2006

Metals Selling Spreads to Grains, Coffee

By DEBBIE CARLSON and HOLLY HENSCHEN

Precious- and base-metals futures fell sharply, hurt largely by selling pressure as both markets continue to tumble from multidecade highs set this spring, setting off a wave of selling that affected most commodities markets.

Grain futures at the Chicago Board of Trade, coffee, sugar and frozen-orange-juice markets at the New York Board of Trade and crude-oil futures at the New York Mercantile Exchange were indirectly influenced by weakness in metals, analysts said.

Most-active August gold lost $44.50 to $566.80 per ounce on the Comex division of the Nymex. Nearby June gold lost $44.30 to $562.50 an ounce. Most-active July silver lost $1.44 to $9.625. The most-active July copper contract fell 21.80 cents to $3.0105 per pound on the Comex division of the New York Mercantile Exchange.

From the high set on May 12, August gold lost 23.5% of its value. From their May 11 highs, July silver fell 37% and July copper fell 25.5%. Yesterday's dollar drop was the June gold contract's biggest since Jan. 25, 1980, and ranks No. 5 in terms of biggest one-day drops for gold.

Metals prices, along with equities and other commodities, are falling as global investors downgrade their expectations of global growth in response to interest-rate hikes in Europe and the U.S., and tough inflation talk by the Federal Reserve. Dollar strength also has been a nemesis for commodities as a stronger greenback makes dollar-denominated commodities pricier.

Dan Vaught, an analyst with A.G. Edwards, said it is possible that commodities have, at least for the short term and possibly well into the intermediate term, set their highs.

"I think we're going to remain in downward pressure in metal and possibly in energies through the summer," Mr. Vaught said.

Losses for gold started in Asia, when spot prices fell under $600 an ounce, and continued into the London and New York sessions.

Some analysts also cited the recent run-up in commodities -- particularly metals -- as overzealous and due for a sharp correction. "We might have set some fairly significant highs in some of the markets. It's not to say that we can't go back and revisit those highs," said Dave Rinehimer, director of futures research at Citigroup Global Markets.

Selling by speculators who entered the metals markets this spring during the rally to recent highs was also a big factor behind the break in metals, said Leonard Kaplan, president of Prospector Asset Management.In other commodity markets:

CRUDE: Futures fell for a second straight session after the International Energy Agency cut its 2006 global oil-demand forecast and reported that developed nations' crude-oil stocks are at a 20-year high. The July crude oil contract settled down $1.80 at $68.56 a barrel.

LEAN HOGS: Prices on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange settled sharply higher, as traders bought back previously sold positions and amid strength in cash hog markets as meat packers compete for tight supplies. Nearby June rose 1.57 cents to 75.10 cents a pound.

-- Cassandra Sweet and Allen Sykora contributed to this article.

Write to Debbie Carlson at debbie.carlson@dowjones.com

Copyright © 2006 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



To: Jon Koplik who wrote (7326)8/21/2006 1:10:19 AM
From: Jon Koplik  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 33421
 
WSJ -- Oil's Price Drop Reignites Debate On Turning Point ........................

August 21, 2006

Oil's Price Drop Reignites Debate On Turning Point

Single-Digit or $100 Barrels? The Answer Probably Depends On Impact of Investment Flows

By ANN DAVIS and BHUSHAN BAHREE

A nearly 8% decline in crude-oil prices in the past two weeks, and the market's flirtation Friday with prices below $70 a barrel, is reigniting a debate: Is there an oil-price bubble, and could it burst?

Underlying the question is an argument about what has been a bigger factor buoying oil prices in the first place: record investor inflows into commodities or supply-and-demand fundamentals.

The answer will go a way toward setting the tone for broader financial markets and the economy. High oil prices have affected everything from consumer spending, to the stock and bond markets, to interest-rate increases by the Federal Reserve to curb inflation.

If oil continues to slide even as international tensions flare, "it is going to be much more difficult to argue that crude oil remains a bull market and that all dips are buying opportunities," says Tim Evans, a futures analyst with Citigroup Inc.

Crude-oil futures contracts for near-month settlement on the New York Mercantile Exchange surged more than 33% over nearly six months, hitting $76.98 a barrel on Aug. 7 before falling to a two-month low Thursday of $70.06. After an intraday low of $69.60 Friday, near-month crude-oil prices bounced back to settle at $71.14 a barrel on news of a storm developing in the Gulf of Mexico.

As prices soared earlier in the summer, oil analysts and economists argued that global economic growth, tight refining capacity to process crude oil into usable products like gasoline, and geopolitical tensions could push crude beyond $80 a barrel, even as oil inventories remained high in the U.S.

These specialists dismiss the notion that crude's recent pullback is a turning point. Instead, they point to short-term factors that have pushed oil lower, including a move by Goldman Sachs Group Inc. this month to reduce its exposure to gasoline in the widely watched Goldman Sachs Commodity Index.

In addition, they say BP PLC's Alaska pipeline shutdown had less of an impact on oil supplies than initially feared. Seasonal factors also play a role, including a lighter-than-expected hurricane season, the ending of the summer driving season and the expected drop in demand for crude from refineries as they shift operations for winter-grade fuels.

"Until I see massive spare capacity in Saudi Arabia or new refining capacity in Asia or the Middle East, the world will still be susceptible to the same exogenous shocks as it has been in the last three years, whether the shocks are from civil strife, geopolitics or weather," says Edward Morse, chief energy economist for Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. He says global demand remains robust.

Still, an increasing number of analysts and traders predict that oil prices are poised for further decline. They say the market has become somewhat inured to geopolitical uncertainty -- reacting to the news of another kidnapping of oil workers in Nigeria, for example, with a 25-cent jump, when the price used to move $2 on such events.

Traders say prices are high considering some key supply-and-demand indicators. Mark Vonderheide, global head of oil trading for Deutsche Bank AG, points to a large buildup in world inventories. Traders are "balancing the fundamental weakness of this market against the probability of some global event or continuation of global events in Nigeria, Iran or Venezuela....Barring an event, it's very likely we're headed for much lower oil prices."

Oil prices may at least level off a bit, some energy researchers say. Larry Goldstein, president of the Petroleum Industry Research Foundation, calls the recent slide in prices "a move to a new equilibrium level, not the start of a major selloff."

Some increasingly vocal bears are making stark forecasts. Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. energy analyst Ben Dell is calling for $50 crude in early 2007. Philip Verleger, an independent energy economist who heads PK Verleger LLC, predicts in an interview that oil could hit the single digits in the next three years.

In particular, they say, the market hasn't fully grasped the import of investment flows into oil futures and the danger that a slowdown in those investments could cause a lull or even a panic in the oil markets. Institutional money managers have $100 billion to $120 billion in commodities, at least double the amount three years ago and up from $6 billion in 1999, says Barclays Capital, the securities unit of Barclays PLC. Mr. Dell estimates such investors have $40 billion invested in crude alone.

"Too much money has been chasing too few commodities futures," Mr. Verleger argues. He says that as long as economic growth continues, oil could climb as high as $100 a barrel in the fourth quarter of 2007. If the economy slows and demand for petroleum eases, investors will scramble for the exits. "There is no floor. The price could fall to single digits. It won't stay there for very long, but it could fall."


Mr. Verleger's dramatic forecast isn't shared by most analysts. Still, the impact of investment flows into commodities has taken some in the oil establishment off guard. As oil prices steadily rose to triple their levels three year ago, ministers from the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, oil-company executives and others have periodically argued that the fundamentals of supply and demand didn't justify the increase.

Deutsche Bank's Mr. Vonderheide says the inflows into index-related oil investments are a big-enough factor that, if they slow, the market could fall further.

In the days leading up to and just after Goldman's Aug. 9 announcement that it was reducing its allocation to gasoline contracts in its index, gasoline futures took a dive.

Write to Ann Davis at ann.davis@wsj.com and Bhushan Bahree at bhushan.bahree@wsj.com

Copyright © 2006 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



To: Jon Koplik who wrote (7326)1/18/2007 11:20:56 PM
From: Jon Koplik  Respond to of 33421
 
WSJ -- Oil consumption fell in the developed world last year for the first time in more than 20 years .........................

January 19, 2007

High Prices Prod Developed World To Curb Oil Use

Data Show First Drop In Two Decades in West; Crude Dips Below $50

By BHUSHAN BAHREE

Mild winter weather has something to do with it. So does heavy selling by financial funds. But a largely overlooked factor in the recent plunge in oil prices may portend an end to the multiyear rise in crude: For the first time in years, the developed world is burning less of it.

Fresh data from the International Energy Agency show oil consumption in the 30 member countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development fell 0.6% in 2006. Though the decline appears small, it marks the first annual drop in more than 20 years among the OECD countries, which drain close to 60% of the 84.4 million barrels of oil used globally each day. Industrialized nations' demand tiptoed into negative territory in 2002, but the dip was so slight that it registered as flat.

Yesterday, U.S. benchmark oil for February delivery settled at $50.48 a barrel, down $1.76, or 3.4%, on the New York Mercantile Exchange. Earlier in the day, futures fell below $50 a barrel for the first time since May 2005, hitting a fresh 20-month low after the Energy Department said U.S. crude-oil stockpiles rose the most in more than four years. Oil has been sliding since peaking above $77 in July. This year, prices have fallen 17%.

The tipping point where oil prices begin to erode demand was reached last summer, several industry analysts said.

The fall in oil use by the industrialized world is a sign that the reactions to higher oil prices by businesses and consumers from the U.S. to Germany to Japan may be adding up to a cycle-turning downdraft in demand. The resulting shift in global cash flows could mean a big boost for oil consumers' economies at the expense of producers and exporters.

Other signals, both economic and psychological, have been popping up for some time: Demand for gas-guzzling sport-utility vehicles has been falling, while investment in and sales of alternative fuels such as ethanol are booming. Even the Bush administration is vowing to reduce America's dependence on crude.

Gasoline prices in the U.S. are also falling, both because of swelling inventories and the slide in crude-oil prices, which can take four to eight weeks to fully pass down to retail pumps.

Yesterday, the AAA automobile club reported regular-grade gasoline below $2 a gallon in Michigan, and at $2 a gallon in Missouri and Oklahoma. The Energy Information Administration of the Energy department said the national average price of a gallon of gasoline was $2.23 as of Jan. 15. The national average may continue to fall in coming weeks, the EIA said in a weekly review published yesterday; it said prices could get close to $2 a gallon by the end of this month or early in February, noting the possibility that the national average could fall below that level.

To be sure, global oil demand grew 0.9% in 2006, owing to steady growth in China and the Middle East. But that was down from growth of 3.9% in 2004 and 1.5% in 2005. And the price fluctuations highlight the role played by expectations, rather than simple supply and demand, in determining the price of oil on world markets.

Many analysts are just starting to review, and lower, their price forecasts for this year, though a fair number still expect crude to rebound to $60 a barrel or even higher. So do some investors who have placed big bets with their own money, including Texas oilman T. Boone Pickens. For some, this stems in part from a belief that $60 is the price the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries aims to defend, though the cartel's de-facto leader, Saudi Oil Minister Ali Naimi, seemed to cast doubt on that notion this week when he said he saw no reason to support further output cuts. But a few analysts say oil's four-year surge could be ending.

"The bubble is bursting," said Frederic Lasserre, head of commodity research at Société Générale in Paris. "The sentiment has changed, and for the first time since January 2002, the hedge funds are going short at the start of the year."

News of the oil-demand drop comes as the debate over how to curb energy consumption is reaching a fever pitch in the U.S., the world's biggest oil consumer. Next week, President Bush is expected in his State of the Union address to expand on a call he issued last year for the country to end its "addiction" to oil. In Congress, bills are circulating to impose cap-and-trade programs, which amount to putting a price on global-warming emissions produced by the combustion of fossil fuels. While this government debate goes on, the OECD data suggest, the market itself is having an effect: When energy prices go up, people consume less energy.

A lasting downdraft in oil prices would trigger a profound redistribution of wealth around the world, putting more money in the pockets of consumers in the West and ending the bonanza enjoyed by oil-company investors and by petro-states such as Venezuela and Iran.

Currencies of some bigger oil exporters, including the Mexican peso, have faced downward pressure in line with falling oil prices. Airlines -- including British Airways PLC and Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. -- have begun removing fuel surcharges imposed on passengers. Nations with significant oil industries -- including Saudi Arabia, Russia and the U.S., the top-three producers -- stand to take a hit to employment, profit and tax receipts in their oil sectors.

The signs of waning demand for oil began bubbling up early last year. Saudi Arabia began to quietly cut back its output in April because it couldn't find buyers for all its crude. Iran, OPEC's second-largest producer after Saudi Arabia, was forced to store unsold oil in tankers last summer.

Yet oil prices were sending contrary signals, peaking on July 14 at $77.03 a barrel because of fears that geopolitics or natural disasters were bound to reduce supplies. At the time, supplies were perceived to be tight, with little spare production capacity available globally to offset sudden losses. Since then, oil prices have fallen by 34% despite supply cuts by OPEC to shore up prices.

Mr. Lasserre's take on the situation is that prices of close to $70 a barrel -- they averaged $66.22 a barrel for 2006 -- marked a turning point. "People wanted to know the point at which oil prices would affect demand; now they have the answer," he said.

One factor that could insulate the world from a big price rebound, paradoxically, is OPEC's recent output cuts. By trimming production, the cartel has swelled the world's volume of spare oil-pumping capacity, particularly in Saudi Arabia, thus easing fears of a supply disruption in some part of the vast global oil chain.

In remarks to reporters in New Delhi this week, Mr. Naimi said the kingdom's spare-capacity cushion would expand to three million barrels a day by Feb. 1, when the second round of output cuts agreed to by OPEC take effect. That is a half-million barrels a day more than is exported by Iran, whose nuclear-research standoff with the U.S. has stirred jitters about supply disruptions in the Persian Gulf.

Oil buyers are watching for signs of OPEC's next move. Some OPEC members, such as Venezuela and Iran, were clamoring for further production cuts, though Mr. Naimi shot down that idea this week.

Some analysts see larger, game-changing forces in motion. One is the rise of nonoil transport fuels. "Last year was a tipping point in a lot of ways," says Philip Verleger Jr., an oil economist who heads PK Verleger LLC. "Biofuels will take bigger and bigger bites out of petroleum demand," Mr. Verleger said, noting climate-change and security concerns relating to the supply and use of petroleum. "Alternate fuels will take up all the growth, leaving petroleum demand static in the next two or three years."

Forecasts by the IEA suggest biofuels output could rise to the equivalent of more than five million barrels of crude oil a day by 2011, close to triple output of such fuels in 2005. Global oil demand last year rose by 780,000 barrels a day to 84.4 million barrels a day, the latest IEA data show.

"Virtually every day, there is a new biofuels plant announced somewhere in the world," says Lawrence Eagles, head of the IEA's oil-industry and markets division.

Mr. Eagles said that in 2005, world output of biofuels was some 650,000 barrels a day, the equivalent of 1.95 million barrels of conventional Middle Eastern crude oil. Biofuel output could rise to as much as 1.7 million barrels a day, or the equivalent of 5.1 million barrels of conventional crude, by 2011, if capacity-expansion plans are taken into account.

According to data published yesterday by the IEA, oil demand last year fell in all three major OECD regions -- North America, Europe and the Pacific. The latter two regions have from time to time had weak oil demand when economic growth was weak. But growth in U.S. oil demand had typically offset this weakness for the OECD as a whole.

But last year, the picture changed more noticeably. "Maybe they started to use less when we hit $3-a-gallon gasoline," Adam Sieminski, an oil analyst at Deutsche Bank, said of U.S. consumers. "Perhaps, toward the middle of 2006 we hit a tipping point."

But Mr. Sieminski questions whether people will forget the pain because oil prices have dropped -- and oil use will again start to increase.

Write to Bhushan Bahree at bhushan.bahree@wsj.com

Copyright © 2007 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.