SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: carranza2 who wrote (163891)4/18/2006 11:45:43 AM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793890
 
I have no problem using the term "illegal alien." But I might in the future if the term begins to connote a particular political stance concerning the ultimate resolution of the problem.

A term means what it means. It still means what it means even after it has been tainted by association with things it doesn't mean. We have to be able to talk about the illegal immigrant demographic. If we don't want to use that expression any longer, then we need a more palatable synonym. We can't just deny the demographic.

I saw a member of my county board make a fool of himself a while back on TV. I posted about it at the time and sent him an email. He was on a panel and refused to answer any questions related to illegal immigrants. Each question he was asked, he went off an a rant about how demeaning the expression was, refusing to acknowledge illegal immigrants as a distinct subset of immigrants. To him it was just plain "immigrants" or nothing. Like I said, he looked the fool. You don't want to go there.



To: carranza2 who wrote (163891)4/18/2006 11:48:15 AM
From: aladin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793890
 
C2,

How can we have 4% unemployment yet hear the claim be made that "they're stealing my job?"

Its all part of the new math. This is the same math used to show why we need a trade surplus like Germany so we can also enjoy 12% unemployment.

John