Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SI Dave who wrote (9563)	4/20/2006 9:17:09 AM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell	Respond to of 12465

If I had more time, I'd have highlighted the relevant (and outrageous) part of the UCSY auditor's censure. As you will see below, taken from the Villasenor complaint, what really allegedly happened is that Zwebner forged the auditor's statement, the auditor complained to Zwebner, but "failed" to take additional means to correct the mistake! In other words, in the world of accounting, the victim of identity theft has a responsibility to take public, not just private, action. 17. Denies the third subparagraph of Paragraph 34 to the extent that no cartel exists, and no class has been alleged in this complaint; no posts in plaintiffs’ “Exhibit 1” were published after January 2005; admits that ZWEBNER has been involved in securities fraud, has forged documents submitted in legal proceedings in relationship to a mortgage contract as referenced in published case law, as well as an SEC filing where the auditor’s statement was forged by plaintiffs, and has committed perjury; and has no knowledge of the balance of Paragraph 34 and accordingly denies the same; and... - Jeff