Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (185439)	4/20/2006 10:10:17 PM
From: jttmab	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

All I'm saying is that Clarke could have just had the decency (and retained his credibility) by absorbing his share of the responsibility rather than acting like it was some kind of "rogue operation" that the White House didn't have a role in. Just to illustrate how you and I think differently. Clarke doesn't specifically say that he was aware of the operation and you claim that he's implying that he didn't know about it. On the other hand I read the same article and figure that since he is writing about the event, he knows about it. How else could he write about it if he didn't know of it? Duh. Do you know who was, according to the 9/11 report, gave the final nod to permit the Bin Laden family to leave the US on 9/11?? Without looking up the 9/11 report my recollection of the bin Laden family leaving the US was myth. Come on now...I've asked you a couple of times about this Taleban threat which you started without explanation and you keep forgetting to reply. I'd love to hear more on that. jttmab