Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jttmab who wrote (185469)	4/21/2006 11:16:11 AM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

jttmab.. Let's back up a bit.. I could care less, for the sake of this particular issue, about Taliban.. Algiers Accords.. etc.. All this is about is Clarke trying to assert that Gringrich (or any other congressperson) could so direct US Foreign Policy to overthrow another government, WITHOUT DIRECT INVOLVEMENT BY THE WHITE HOUSE. Pretty simple... So why you've suddenly gone from "Just making this stuff up" Message 22369281 To... "I'm equally not bothered whether the Clinton Administration/Richard Clarke would have been involved in any such discussions." Maybe if you were a little slower on the trigger with regard to accusing people of "making stuff up", and a little quicker in coming to the opinion expressed in your last post... That's it's likely that Clarke knew.. Then we get to the real issue.. Such as why is Clarke not admitting that the Clinton administration was involved?? And btw... I could care less about the Algiers Accord when it comes to governments that are guilty of violating it themselves... Especially one such as Iran, which has called for the complete destruction of other countries, not just their governments. Hawk