Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jackjc who wrote (9513)	4/21/2006 3:04:52 PM
From: crustyoldprospector	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78416

Jack, I've had my eye on GGN since you first mentioned it, and that was when it was trading in the 40s I believe. Other fish to fry, you know. Anyway, yes, .1 oz is fine if the recovery is good, and a lot of Nevada gold is from ore of similar or lesser richness. Look at the way WGDF has flown as an indicator. I expect Gryphon to put on a quick double from here once a resource calculation is updated, or sooner ... provided POG stays up, of course. MVG is a good low-quality play too, IMO. FWIW, crusty

To: jackjc who wrote (9513)	4/23/2006 1:24:47 PM
From: loantech	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 78416

Jack, I have asked this question before and did not save your answer. Sorry. As per others advice incl. yours still looking at broader diversification in Mexico and Nevada and Canada. Looking at current or future production amongst some of the gold and silver players. I own GGC and it will remain my primary silver producer for now. How do you rank in order from best to worst the following SPM, CS, EXN, GPR, IPT? I like GPR as they have large exploring upside and can expand to 1200 t/day, I like CS as it is a Claude pick and they may have a 1000 t/day plant and sometimes bigger is better. Claude has pointed out he likes SPM as they have rich grades and also a 650 t/day plant. IPT has great grades lots of news stocks and you have mentioned their plant may need more refurbishing than others. Even though I sold way too prematurely, with the new 43-101 3.5 mill ounce potential at WGDF I am thinking of adding. Maybe adding QEE back and USGL as they have Nevada looking good for exploration and are permitted to produce and are producing in some cases now. Any reason not to own this group as small part of PF if I expect gold to run for a few years? Also still watching you reco of CMM, and others I have watched such as NGX and KGI. RMKL still one with value. I know there are many others out there that you may like but am curious mostly about the ones I mentioned. Thanks for you input. Now out to do some yard work. PS;ANYONE ELSE WANTS TO TAKE A SHOT PRO OR CON ON ANY OF THESE STOCKS PLEASE DO. Claude, howy, truescouse, coach etc etc. Left lots of good people out but comments are appreciated.