Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : The *NEW* Frank Coluccio Technology Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: axial who wrote (14731)	4/22/2006 10:45:13 PM
From: axial	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 46821

Peter, I've been puzzling over your response and mine all afternoon. What am I missing? "Receivers designed without regard for 'interference' may fail." That seems obvious. At 2.4 GHz, from Bluetooth to microwave ovens and phones, there are all kinds of emitters, many not sophisticated. Are you saying potential receivers can overcome the effects of such interference? Or not be affected by it? Receivers saturate in the sense that the information transmitted to them can't be extracted, because of spurious signals (or simple non-informational white noise). Granted, there are many schemes to avoid interference, but at some point, there's nowhere to hop to, no clear channel, and no avoidable collision. Apologies if there's something I haven't grasped, here. Jim