SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: bond_bubble who wrote (59170)4/22/2006 8:56:06 PM
From: shades  Respond to of 110194
 
Bush: New Iraqi Govt `Will Make America More Secure'

(I feel safer don't you? :)

WEST SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP)--U.S. President George W. Bush said Saturday the new Iraqi government "will make America more secure' and suggested it could be the beginning of an eventual drawdown of U.S. forces from Iraq.

After months of political deadlock, Iraq's parliament convened Saturday and filled top leadership posts, starting the process of putting together a new government aimed at pulling the country out of insurgency and sectarian strife.

"The new Iraqi government will assume greater responsibility for their nation's security," Bush told reporters upon his arrival in West Sacramento, Calif., for an energy event.

"It will have the popular mandate to address Iraq's toughest long-term challenges," said Bush, standing in front of his helicopter. "These are major challenges and the new Iraqi government will not face them alone,

The president offered congratulations to the Iraqi people. He cast the day as a milestone in Iraq's path to democracy and as a victory in his war on terror.

"This historic achievement by determined Iraqis will make America more secure," he said.


(END) Dow Jones Newswires

April 22, 2006 17:21 ET (21:21 GMT)

Copyright (c) 2006 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.- - 05 21 PM EDT 04-22-06



To: bond_bubble who wrote (59170)4/22/2006 9:11:48 PM
From: shades  Respond to of 110194
 
OPEC says oil supplies not the problem
Sat Apr 22, 2006 4:43 PM BST
Printer Friendly | Email Article | RSS (Page 1 of 2)


today.reuters.co.uk


By Tim Ahmann
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - OPEC oil-producing nations said on Saturday oil prices have risen despite a well-supplied market, adding it was urgent to find new indicators of price trends to supplant the now-unreliable gauge of oil stocks.

"This price rise occurred despite the fact that the market continues to be well-supplied," OPEC official Adnan Shihab-Eldin told a meeting of the International Monetary Fund's policy committee on behalf of the oil cartel.

"The healthy situation on the supply side is further demonstrated by OECD crude oil inventories, which are at comfortable levels both in absolute terms and in days of forward cover, while U.S. commercial crude oil stock levels have reached their highest levels in eight years," he added, referring to the 30-nation Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.

Crude prices leapt to a new peak over $75 a barrel on Friday, spurred by persistent worries a showdown over Iran's nuclear program could wind up disrupting supplies.

Oil-consuming nations have urged more spending to boost production. In the latest plea, finance officials from the Group of Seven rich nations on Friday cited oil prices as a potential stumbling block for the global economy.

However, U.S. Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman said on Friday he agreed with the assessment that markets are well-supplied and would not call on OPEC to boost production at talks between major producers and consumers in Doha, Qatar, this weekend.

The April 22-24 Doha gathering brings together ministers from 65 nations with top executives of oil firms in an effort to find ways to bring oil prices down to earth.

Shihab-Eldin said uncertainties over future demand were complicating investment decisions and "increasing the risks associated with both under- and over- investment." He said the need for "appropriate investment" extended to the entire supply-chain.

He drew a distinction between the ample supplies on the crude side and tight supplies of refined products.

"The picture on the products side remains tight, given the persistently low levels of refinery spare capacity and more stringent products specifications" in the United States, the OPEC official said.

"As a result, any shortage caused by technical or logistic problems will continue to have a significant impact on the global market, affecting products prices and, consequently, crude oil prices," he added.

Shihab-Eldin lamented that ample crude stocks had failed to tamp down oil price volatility stemming from unexpected supply disruptions or geopolitical concerns.

"Unfortunately the upward rising trend indicates that healthy market fundamentals have been unable to outweigh fears of possible future supply disruptions," he said.

He said the breakdown in the link between inventories and prices had led to an "urgent" need to identify more-reliable signals of price trends. He also said OPEC was concerned over the impact lofty oil prices could have on developing countries, and would monitor development closely.



To: bond_bubble who wrote (59170)4/22/2006 9:20:58 PM
From: shades  Respond to of 110194
 
brain cells linked to choice

Perhaps there is no free will Jay

today.reuters.co.uk

Scientists find brain cells linked to choice
Sun Apr 23, 2006 12:03 AM BST
Printer Friendly | Email Article | RSS

LONDON (Reuters) - If choosing the right outfit or whether to invest in stocks or bonds is difficult, it may not be just indecisiveness but how brain cells assign values to different items, scientists said on Sunday.

Researchers at Harvard Medical School in Boston have identified neurons, or brain cells, that seem to play a role in how a person selects different items or goods.

Scientists have known that cells in different parts of the brain react to attributes such as color, taste or quantity. Dr Camillo Padaoa-Schioppa and John Assad, an associate professor of neurobiology, found neurons involved in assigning values that help people to make choices.

"The neurons we have identified encode the value individuals assign to the available items when they make choices based on subjective preferences, a behavior called economic choice," Padoa-Schioppa said in a statement.

The scientists, who reported the findings in the journal Nature, located the neurons in an area of the brain known as the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) while studying macaque monkeys which had to choose between different flavors and quantities of juices.

They correlated the animals' choices with the activity of neurons in the OFC with the valued assigned to the different types of juices. Some neurons would be highly active when the monkeys selected three drops of grape juice, for example, or 10 drops of apple juice.

Other neurons encoded the value of only the orange juice or grape juice.

"The monkey's choice may be based on the activity of these neurons," said Padoa-Schioppa.

Earlier research involving the OFC showed that lesions in the area seem to have an association with eating disorders, compulsive gambling and unusual social behavior.

The new findings show an association between the activity of the OFC and the mental valuation process underlying choice behavior, according to the scientists.

"A concrete possibility is that various choice deficits may result from an impaired or dysfunctional activity of this population (of neurons), though this hypothesis remains to be tested," Padoa-Schioppa.



To: bond_bubble who wrote (59170)4/24/2006 12:26:44 PM
From: shades  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 110194
 
The Dukes Of Moral Hazard

.
By Arindam Nag
A DOW JONES NEWSWIRES COLUMN


LONDON (Dow Jones)--The U.K. government's "Crown guarantee" for the bulk of BT Group's pension liabilities in the event the telecom behemoth goes bust is good news for investors and employees - but it also puts the state's role back in the spotlight.

BT is a product of Thatcher's privatization drive in the 1980s, which saw dozens of big corporations in the energy, transport, infrastructure and defense sectors come to market.

But the fact that BT enjoys this "crown guarantee" has only just come to light - and it raises the question of how many other privatized entities were promised the same thing, which effectively puts billions of pounds of taxpayer money at stake.

There's no central list of these crown guarantees as they were given out by individual industrial departments under the Conservative government of the day. It's also not clear how these guarantees will work.

True, providing a guarantee for the liabilities offers an extra layer of security for pensioners. But it also ropes the state into management questions - the government will now have to make it clear that it won't tolerate any overt aggression from the part of BT's management.

What if BT takes on extra leverage and pursues an expensive acquisition that drives down its net worth and future profitability? The probability of this happening in BT's case is low, but there ought to rules in place to cover extreme situations, and to prevent companies with guarantees from falling into the temptation of moral hazard.

If there's a lender of last resort, or a bailout promise, management could be too easily tempted to take on undue risk.

In addition, taxpayer money shouldn't be taken for granted. If the state wants to guarantee full payment of liabilities in the event BT or any other former state-owned entity goes bust, it must act as if its effectively taking a put option on some of the assets.

In the U.S. the Pension Benefit Guarantee Corp was set up to take care of pension needs of nearly 34 million workers and retirees. But according to a report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) the PBGC has a deficit of over $23 billion, and many now question its viability.

Corporations should also take a hard look at how they allocate money in their pension fund, and how these investment decisions stack up with the demographics of the beneficiaries.

Thanks to healthcare advances, people are living longer than they used 20 years ago. Lower interest rates have also lifted the present value of future liabilities. The trick now is to strike the right balance between various assets and the risks associated with them.

BT, for instance, took a body blow on its pension fund because its investments were 64% skewed towards equities, according to its 2005 annual report. BT's deficit widened during the 2002-03 stock market bubble. Of course, this year the deficit is down to GBP1.8 billion from GBP3.3 billion last year, but the risk of volatility remains. These mega-pension funds should be encouraged to look at other investment options, beyond just publicly-traded stocks and bonds. Real estate, diversified by geography and sector, is one area worth considering. Private equity and hedge funds could also be used to boost pension fund assets.

BT and other former state-run firms should be forced to achieve the right balance between risk management and returns. If they think there's a safety net to pick up the pieces if investments go awry, the temptation to go down the riskier paths may become too great.

(Arindam Nag has covered business and finance for 15 years in Asia, Europe and the United States. He can be reached at +44 207-842-9289 or by e-mail: arindam.nag@dowjones.com)


(END) Dow Jones Newswires

April 24, 2006 09:31 ET (13:31 GMT)

Copyright (c) 2006 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.- - 09 31 AM EDT 04-24-06



To: bond_bubble who wrote (59170)4/24/2006 1:14:54 PM
From: shades  Respond to of 110194
 
OCC Chief Attended Fundraisers When Lobbying For Freddie

(Dugan - comptroller of the currency - how can a fox watch the henhouse? :) This is no different than the 80's scandals eh? Don't forget the keating 5)

By Damian Paletta

OF DOW JONES NEWSWIRES


WASHINGTON (Dow Jones)--Following negative publicity in 2003, Freddie Mac (FRE) asked the law firm Covington & Burling to investigate more than 75 controversial political fundraisers thrown by the mortgage giant's top lobbyist, R. Mitchell Delk.

At the time, Covington officials privately notified Freddie Mac that one of their top partners, John C. Dugan, attended at least eight of the fundraisers. Within days of those dinners, Dugan donated a total of $3,250 to the Republican candidates Delk had honored.

"You get hundreds of these solicitations when you are in the private sector," Dugan said in an interview Monday defending his attendance. "You go to some of them if they are someone you want to give money to."

Last Tuesday, the Federal Election Commission alleged the fundraisers broke campaign finance laws and reached a record $3.8 million settlement with Freddie Mac. None of the attendees were sanctioned, but Delk and several others were given letters of admonishment for how the fundraisers were organized.

Dugan, now the Comptroller of the Currency, had been one of Freddie Mac's lead outside lobbyists when he attended the fundraisers between 2001 and 2003. He helped bring in $880,000 from Freddie Mac to the law firm from 1998 to 2004, according to the Center for Public Integrity, which monitors lobbying disclosures.

Dugan said he was not attending the dinners as a representative of Freddie Mac or Covington but as a "private citizen."

"I did, at the time, represent Freddie Mac on a number of issues, but my attendence" was as a private citizen, he said.

Dugan left the firm last August to oversee the federal agency that has jurisdiction over all the country's national banks.

His presence sheds new light on the fundraisers, which both led to Delk's resignation and more problems for the government-sponsored enterprise as it tried to emerge from a $5 billion accounting scandal in 2003.

The FEC records linking Dugan to the dinners present him as one of the few people with connections to Freddie Mac who participated in the fundraisers. But he said there were others.

"There were many, many such people," he said, though he said he could not recall who.

Dugan said he and Delk have been friends for years, having served together on the Senate Banking Committee in the late 1980s.

Delk's attorney, Kenneth Gross, has said that the fundraisers, which raised $1.7 million for the candidates, were private and were not meant to represent Freddie in any way.

"It is a common practice for the government relations people to hold fundraisers in their personal capacity," Dugan said.

The FEC said that Delk and others had referred to the fundraisers as "Political Risk Management."

In 2002, Delk told then-Freddie chief executive Leland Brendsel that "we proposed to Chairman Oxley a political model that was bold and unprecedented," according to the FEC. "We offered to use our fundraising model to marry his interests as Chairman with our interest in assisting committee members supportive of the continued strength of America's housing finance system..."

Delk also referred to the dinners as highlights of the government relations practice at Freddie Mac.

Dugan said he did not know how Delk had communicated with the board about these dinners and could not speculate if that would have led him to not attend the dinners.

"That's kind of a hypothetical," he said.

Despite Dugan's attendance at the fundraisers, Covington still conducted the internal probe and represented Freddie Mac when it reached the record $3.8 million settlement with the FEC.

"Yes, Freddie Mac was fully informed that a Covington partner had attended some of these fundraisers, as had obviously many other individuals around town," said Robert K. Kelner, a partner at Covington who represented Freddie in its FEC settlement.

Covington has not publicly released its internal review of the fundraisers, but Kelner said the firm was not asked to vet the dinners before questions arose in 2003.

"Our firm, including John Dugan while he was here, was not counsel to Freddie Mac in regard to the events hosted by Mr. Delk at the Galileo restaurant or in regard to any of Mr. Delk's fundraising activities," Kelner said.

Dugan was not involved in Covington's investigation, but he was involved in assessing the political and legislative risks these dinners might have on the GSE.

"It was very carefully considered about whether it raised any ethical or conflict issues," Dugan said. "It was decided that it had not."

Craig Holman, the campaign finance lobbyist at Public Citizen who filed the original complaint against Freddie to the FEC, disagreed.

"It clearly shows a conflict of interest," regarding Covington's role in the case, he said. "Any time at which you have an entity which is investigating where their own business practices are at stake, it is a very questionable study immediately," he said.

Federally chartered corporations such as Freddie Mac are prohibited from making contributions in connection with federal elections, and the FEC alleged that these fundraisers violated that law. Freddie did not admit wrongdoing in the case.


Fundraisers Were Held When GSE Legislation Was Pending


The main benefactor of the fundraisers was House Financial Services Committee Chairman Michael Oxley, R-Ohio. Fundraisers were also held for other members of the House committee.

One of the most high-profile legislative battles over the last five years for the financial services industry has been the push to create a new regulator for Fannie Mae (FNM) and Freddie Mac. Several bills have failed, as House and Senate lawmakers could not agree on what limits should be placed on both government-sponsored enterprises.

Oxley's committee has jurisdiction over the bills in the House.

Fannie and Freddie have each struggled to rebound from major accounting scandals in the last three years. Both GSEs have replaced their chief executive officers and other top brass.


Dugan's Eight Donations


Three of Dugan's donations were made to Oxley's political action commmittees. Delk held a fundraiser for Oxley's PAC on Jan. 17, 2003, and Dugan donated $1,000 to the campaign the next day, according to FEC records.

Another fundraiser was held for the PAC on Jan. 16, 2002. Dugan donated $250 six days later. A third fundraiser was held for the PAC on Jan. 21, 2003, and Dugan donated $500 on Jan. 23.

Other donations that coincided with Delk's fundraisers were $250 donated seven days after a dinner held for Rep. Mike Castle, R-Del., $250 donated 18 days after a dinner held for Rep. Tom Davis, R-Va., $250 donated 10 days after a dinner for Rep. Deborah Pryce's, R-Ohio, PAC, $250 donated 16 days after a fundraiser for Rep. Roy Blunt's, R-Mo., PAC, and $500 donated nine days after a dinner held for Sen. Bill Frist's, R-Tenn., PAC.

Dugan's term at the OCC expires in 2010. His agency does not have oversight over Fannie and Freddie, but it does regulate banks that compete with both GSEs on the secondary-mortgage market.

-By Damian Paletta, Dow Jones Newswires; 202-862-9241; Damian.Paletta@dowjones.com


(END) Dow Jones Newswires

April 24, 2006 12:57 ET (16:57 GMT)

Copyright (c) 2006 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.- - 12 57 PM EDT 04-24-06