SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Crazy Fools LightHouse -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ms.smartest.person who wrote (1004)4/24/2006 10:59:09 AM
From: ms.smartest.person  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3198
 
Economists call for political union to prevent euro collapse

24.04.2006 - 09:59 CET | By Lucia Kubosova
Prominent Belgian economist Paul de Grauwe has argued the euro is bound to collapse in 10 to 20 years as there is no clear progress towards a political union in Europe.

Professor De Grauwe from the Catholic University of Leuven, advocated the creation of the common currency in the 1990s but his forthcoming research paper will present evidence of the euro's risks for the future, news agency AFP reports.

"A political union is the logical end-point of a currency union," Mr De Grauwe told Belgian weekly, The Business, adding "The monetary union will collapse ... not next year, but on a time frame of 10 or 20 years. There is not a single monetary union which survived without political union. They have all collapsed."

Economists point out that the common currency was established with the view to creating more jobs, higher growth and lower prices, but the current situation is far less optimistic.

Growth is around two percent a year in the 12-member eurozone and high unemployment - above 8 percent – remains.

These problems relate to the poor record of individual member states in pursuing reforms to improve economic performance, but the EU has little powers to sanction them for failing to do so.

"If political union fails to materialise, then in the long term the euro area cannot continue to exist," argues Mr De Grauwe.

The Belgian economist is not the only expert to raise the issue.

The same point was made at last week's hearing of a new member of the European Central Bank's board, German Bundesbank's vice president Jurgen Stark.

"The EU currently is in a critical phase," Mr Stark told MEPs on Tuesday (15 April), adding "I am concerned about these trends because monetary union ... needs a common political foundation and a political commitment to function smoothly."

euobserver.com



To: ms.smartest.person who wrote (1004)4/25/2006 9:39:45 PM
From: ms.smartest.person  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3198
 
Be Careful What You Wish For
April 25, 2006

Michael Panzner is author of "The New Laws of the Stock Market Jungle: An Insider’s Guide to Successful Investing in a Changing World" and a 20-year veteran of the stock, bond and currency markets. He is currently at work on a book about global financial risks.

The U.S. stock market has held up remarkably well in recent weeks, despite surging commodities and precious metals prices, bond yields hitting new 4-year highs, a shaky dollar, mixed economic data, and a downward spiral in presidential approval ratings.

Not to mention a less-than-stellar outlook from corporate America, just as another earnings season gets under way.

For the optimists, that suggests the market is still in a bullish, climb-the-wall-of-worry mode. Which means, in their eyes at least, that share prices will invariably move higher, signaling that things remain on a positive track, despite current developments.

Many seasoned observers, meanwhile, are scratching their heads, wondering just what they are missing. Especially in light of the fact that technical and seasonal factors remain unsupportive at best, the U.S. real estate bubble seems to be bursting, and the three-year old rally is looking very tired.

Perhaps the bulls are right, and the pessimists need to wake up to a new reality. One where they can move past their fears and join with those in the majority who are betting on an inevitable further rise in share prices that will be a precursor of still more good times to come.

Then again, maybe the rose-colored-glasses set are wrong. Maybe what we are seeing now, in fact, are the early signs of something altogether different from what we have experienced before.

The kind of thing that sclerotic, poorly-led, overleveraged, and often-corrupt “lesser-developed” nations have gone through—over and over again.

In other words, an economic and financial crisis, where the home currency plunges, interest rates surge into the double-digits, and the cost of energy, basic commodities, and a wide range of goods and services goes through the roof.

And, curiously enough, where share prices—especially those of export-sensitive companies—often soar to dizzying heights, albeit in nominal terms, as beleaguered investors seek some sort of shelter from the ravages of inflation and foreign-exchange-related chaos.

A situation that is largely familiar to those who live in places like Brazil, Argentina, Turkey and Zimbabwe. But not—up to now, at least—those who are from America.

Indeed, rather than being viewed as a cause for optimism and evidence of future economic vitality, rising stock prices in circumstances where the current account deficit is 7% of GDP, where total debt is three times output, and where there is xenophobic talk of tariffs and walled borders, may, in fact, represent something else.

Namely, the desperation of those who fear being left impoverished by the economic bunker-buster that such imbalances have inflicted on similarly-situated nations in the past.

In other words, those betting that U.S. equity prices will move considerably higher in the period ahead should be careful what they wish for.

Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of David W. Tice & Associates, LLC. The opinions are subject to change, are not guaranteed and should not be considered recommendations to buy or sell any security.

prudentbear.com



To: ms.smartest.person who wrote (1004)6/17/2006 5:41:24 PM
From: ms.smartest.person  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 3198
 
Dear Jim Cramer,

I'm feeling sorry for you, Jim, because it looks as if you're trying to fit a size 14 foot into a size 7 shoe. You have to adjust. Don't you know that something that works in a bull market just might not work in a bear market. Your antics like trying to cut the heads off miniature bulls with a Bowie knife or slugging a piñata with a baseball bat or swinging at a box of Uncle Ben's Rice to try to "get even" with Ben Bernacke are "cute and entertaining" but not what your audience needs right now.

I know there's another, less manic, side to you since I've seen you in other roles (like when you were on Meet the Press). You, or your staff, are innovative and have improvised before. You created the current crazy format, you popularized the Lightning Round, you took your shtick to college.

Yes, "there's always a bull market somewhere" and they're relatively easy to find when, in fact, the market is in bull mode. Unfortunately, it just doesn't play well in a world-wide bear market when about the only safe thing for the average investor to do is be in cash, in puts or short stocks and ETFs.

I know you're constrained because of restrictions against promoting short selling but I trust your instincts and creativity. Adjust and change the format! If you don't you're putting whatever credibility you have left at risk (even more than it already has suffered by being a perennial stock "touter"). Trying to shift the blame on Bernacke is lame. As you well know, this correction probably would have taken place without a change in the Fed Guard and then everyone would have been blaming Greenspan either for not tightening fast enough in the face of a flood of too many dollars or of tightening too much in the face a softening economy.

If Cramerica is to survive through this bear market then you need to stop trying to be the comedian and, at least until we weather this bear market, be a stateman more like Rukheyser. The situation needs a steady hand and level head. And you're not providing the sort of guidance investors need right now.

Draw on your years of experience and compare this market with past markets, its differences and similarities. You should now be helping investors know when we start approaching the bottom and what to do then. Shift your focus from pushing individual dogs (like RDA ... I still can't believe it!) to tools, techniques, processes. What's wrong with speaking with some technicians, they picked this top long before you did and now have some ideas on where the bottom might be. You might even invite some differing opinions. Or are you afraid that if you expand your viewers' minds they'll stop following you like sheep to the slaughterhouse.

stockchartist.blogspot.com