Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : I Will Continue to Continue, to Pretend.... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neeka who wrote (19596)	4/25/2006 4:05:24 AM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35834

<< "why is it that we can't call them alleged "secret prisons" rather just the "secret prisons" since it hasn't been proven that they even exist?" >> Well, I guess we can, but that won't make any difference. The MSM will keep on calling them "secret prisons". If they went with the more accurate alleged secret prisons, then they'd actually have to inform Americans that there is no real evidence to substantiate their existence. That would call the credibility of the illegal leaker into question. Keep in mind that the MSM has gone so long now without ever correcting the story when additional facts & evidence came out casting doubt about their existence. And keep in mind how many times they told us these sites were used to torture those prisoners. That would place the credibility of the MSM into question. It would also be a big plus for the Bush Admin. Do you think the MSM really wants all that to happen?