SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The *NEW* Frank Coluccio Technology Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Peter Ecclesine who wrote (14785)4/25/2006 8:27:56 AM
From: Elsewhere  Respond to of 46821
 
In the meantime, EWC (Atheros/Broadcom/Intel/Marvell) silicon is in the market

A German article on a couple of pre-802.11n devices:
heise.de



To: Peter Ecclesine who wrote (14785)4/25/2006 3:10:21 PM
From: Frank A. Coluccio  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 46821
 
[802.11n]

Thanks, Peter. That's pretty much consistent with my thoughts on the matter. Today I came across another piece in EE Times that sheds some more light on some early adaptations of the proposed standard that is now in draft form, and it's not very pretty:
---

Analyst: 802.11n gear falls short in testing

According to independent tests performed by Craig Mathias of Fairpoint Group, the first round of IEEE Draft N-compliant wireless networking gear from Netgear and Buffalo Technology was disappointing in terms of performance and interoperability. The tests took place in a typical home environment and analyzed Buffalo's AirStation Nfiniti router and client, which makes use of Broadcom's Intensi-fi chipset and Netgear's RangeMax Next client and routers. "Draft N is misleading... we couldn't even get the equipment to talk to each other. That [lack of interoperability] was surprising," said Mathias, who couldn't get Netgear's equipment to communicate with Buffalo's. "We couldn't even get the two Netgear systems to talk."

For more on Draft N equipment:
- see this article from EETimes:
eetimes.com

------

FAC



To: Peter Ecclesine who wrote (14785)5/3/2006 12:07:41 AM
From: Peter Ecclesine  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 46821
 
Hi Frank,

>>is .11n soup yet?<<

Working Group ballot on Draft 1.0

~80% return rate of all voters

~175 voted Do Not Approve with comments, will be lucky to recirculate before September, as each comment must be responded to, and many said D1.0 was not complete.

Needs at least 75% approval rate to go to Sponsor Ballot.

petere