SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: BUGGI-WO who wrote (195176)4/26/2006 7:11:06 PM
From: Joe NYCRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
Buggi,

Again, of course - I assume the same, but does this has to
mean, that AMDs ASPs couldn't increase?
I asked this question from time to time and noone could
answer this yet - why should Intel command a 25-30% higher
overall ASP with no better or even equal products in the
LONG-TERM! ???


I exchanged some posts on the subject with DARBES and niceguy. Intel monopoly premium may be shrinking, the difference is narrowing. Niceguy suggested that maybe the 2 companies will meet in the middle. Or it may just be that Intel may descend down to AMD levels.

I think the opportunity is greater in growing units. AMD has not been overly aggressive in growing units on the low end for last 3 quarters, because of capacity constraints. When capacity ceases to be an issue, AMD can be a lot more aggressive on low end, while at the same time, trying to penetrate corporate market, notebooks and servers. So the result could be unchanged ASPs, but units growing significantly.

Joe

PS: Now, with a pile of cash burning a hole in my pocket, I am thinking about a (very) long shot in the Opteron ecosystem - CRAY. Any opinions? Delisting threat seems to have been cured.



To: BUGGI-WO who wrote (195176)4/26/2006 7:51:27 PM
From: PetzRespond to of 275872
 
re: <Intel price premium> Apparently it's gone in the server CPU market, where AMD has 27% dollar market share but only 22% unit market share. But the 27% number *might* be for server costs rather than CPU costs.

Petz