SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rink who wrote (195368)4/27/2006 4:10:12 PM
From: BUGGI-WORead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
[Edited] @Rink/Doug
Boa, your sentiments got down deeply. Thats OK and everyone
has to take his own actions and if its sell, just do it. No-
one could argue against this/fear. But I have the feeling,
that some/most people discuss AMDs future products without
knowing something. I don't say, that I have all that much
deep infos, but I'm carefull with expecting this or that just
on assumptions or just on HW Sites which writes the some
content from each other and everyone puts another failure
into.

BTW: I was not at home and I'm now hearing Intels Marketing
show. I had many laughs in first 1:30h.

Edit:
I just "hoped" AMD could go down just a bid, so I could add
even more ... I assume a relativly fast run into the 35$
region and if we could break through 35, heading to 40.

BUGGI



To: Rink who wrote (195368)4/27/2006 4:31:55 PM
From: j3pflynnRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Rink - re:"I'm not convinced any kind of SiGe-based strain will make it to 90nm before end 2006."

Based on what? The AMD presentation noted on mycom is the best info I've seen on the subject.



To: Rink who wrote (195368)4/27/2006 4:39:14 PM
From: dougSF30Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
I'm not following-- are you saying the slides are inaccurate, or the timing for 65nm is inaccurate? If neither, then you should be convinced that SiGe is set for 90nm before year's end.



To: Rink who wrote (195368)4/27/2006 6:22:27 PM
From: FJBRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
I posted this earlier. last 90nm transistor = first 65nm transistor
pcweb.mycom.co.jp
pcweb.mycom.co.jp
pcweb.mycom.co.jp