Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : FREE AMERICA -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DMaA who wrote (4882)	4/29/2006 9:41:31 AM
From: KLP	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14758

Thanks DMA...Sometimes I wonder if he purposely misses my point...but it's hard to know.

To: DMaA who wrote (4882)	4/29/2006 8:32:14 PM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14758

if its true, she gets nailed just like you. If you agree with her that carseats and helmets for kids should be at the discretion of the parents you are in the same boat. Problem is that what you consider freedom has little to do with its meaning. The only time you can make a valid point is with second amendment issues because they are in the constitution--but there is not one word about car registration, or safety rules and regs. I agree that the govt can get heavy handed if unchecked. Seat belts are not that. Laws against cell phones while driving are not. And so on. Just because you have an extreme libertarian view doesnt mean that its somehow its enshrined in the constitution.