SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Casavant Mining Kimberlite International (CMKM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: rrufff who wrote (2040)5/1/2006 11:10:53 AM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2595
 
Circle Group Holdings Alerts Shareholders to Obtain Paper Certificates
Monday May 1, 9:05 am ET
Cites Rampant Failures to Deliver, Naked Short Selling, 'Phantom' Shares

MUNDELEIN, Ill., May 1 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Circle Group Holdings, Inc. (Amex: CXN - News), announced today that it is mailing the following letter to all shareholders of record.

April 28, 2006

To All CXN Shareholders

Dear Loyal Shareholder,

THERE IS A CRITICAL NEED FOR YOU TO CALL THE BROKERAGE WHERE YOUR CXN
SHARES ARE BEING HELD AND INSTRUCT THEM TO PROMPTLY DELIVER TO YOU ALL OF
YOUR SHARES IN PHYSICAL CERTIFICATE FORM. THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT GETTING
ALL OF YOUR SHARES IN HAND COULD HAVE A SIGNIFICANT, NEGATIVE EFFECT ON
YOUR INVESTMENT.

Why do I need to request my shares in physical certificate form?

It has come to our attention that a significant number of "phantom shares"
of our Company's common stock has been sold into the market during the
past 24 months. It appears the sellers are acting within and through major
brokerage firms in the capital markets, with their primary goal being to
damage the Company and our stock's value, while illegally profiting at our
expense from any price decline. We have seen no evidence that the sellers
plan to buy any shares to cover their illegitimately created positions.
These manipulative actions are preventing you and all real shareholders
from experiencing the value that a fair, balanced and orderly market could
provide.

The "shares" you believe you own in the Company are "securities
entitlements", and are either backed by genuine stock certificates, or
backed by IOUs lacking any corresponding stock certificates to support
them. These IOUs are commonly referred to as counterfeit shares, phantom
shares, and naked short sales.

What is a naked short sale?

Short selling is a bet that a company's stock will fall. In a legitimate
short sale, a real investor sells stock they borrowed, hoping to buy it
back at a lower price to replenish the lender. They take the risk that if
a stock goes up instead of down, they must buy back in at a loss.

In a naked short sale, the seller sells stock they have not borrowed, and
does not intend to borrow, and then pockets the proceeds from the sale.
Naked short sellers have built an elaborate infrastructure they use to
manipulate stocks -- achieving spectacular gains at the expense of honest
investors. The players are corrupt, well-organized industry insiders who
often combine anonymous blogging, phony research reports, and crooked
financial news reporters into orchestrated attacks to "short and distort"
targeted companies. Company facts are twisted, skewed, and re-invented as
a series of half-truths, creating the illusion that the companies and
their management are unfocused -- the intent is to create fear and doubt
about the Company's prospects, and to generate an endless need for
management to respond to attacks, rather than tend to their business.

Billions of dollars in trades are left "unsettled" (undelivered) daily in
the US capital markets. This is called 'Failure to Deliver' (FTD). The
investor's account is debited the cost of the stock they wish to buy,
their account statement is updated to show that they bought it, but the
underlying stock is not delivered -- it "fails to be delivered." The
average shareholder has no idea this has taken place, as their account
statement (really just a piece of paper generated by their broker) assures
them they "own" genuine "shares." This is a kind of fraud. Naked short
selling accounts for a large amount of 'Failure to Deliver' positions, and
it's a disgraceful commentary on just how badly corrupt Wall Street
insiders have abused investors' trust. It really is a case of "the fox
guarding the henhouse." Consider this: how do you think the legal system
would treat you if you sold something you didn't own, and decided to never
deliver it? Another way to describe this is to call it what it is --
premeditated stealing. Worse, the problem of FTDs calls into question the
issue of market integrity.

FTDs represent an attack on the fundamental fairness of the market. At the
heart of a fair market is a respect for 'supply and demand'. Once the
supply side of the equation has been artificially manipulated, all bets
are off as to the fairness of the marketplace. When there is no cap on the
supply of shares -- because market participants are able to sell stock
that they don't have, and which doesn't exist -- prices are subject to
downward manipulation. Increased supply overwhelms buyers and crushes the
stock price or hampers appreciation.

In the past, our Company has successfully fought against many such
onslaughts, marshalling the intestinal fortitude and management team
necessary to prevail. Many firms, however, aren't as fortunate, and have
succumbed to these attacks, leading to the loss of jobs, income, investor
gains, and the innovation that is a fundamental of the American economy.
"Attack of the Blogs" is a controversial cover story in last fall's Forbes
magazine, featuring our battle with this sort of shadow threat.

Small-cap companies like Circle Group Holdings are targets.

This attack is not perpetrated exclusively on our stock. According to
some estimates the problem has reached epidemic proportions in the public
markets, and it has the abovementioned negative effect of diminishing the
equity value of legitimate investments. To be clear, what we are
describing is real, widespread and receiving increasing visibility,
culminating most recently in a series of anti-trust lawsuits by hedge
funds against their prime brokers for precisely this practice of naked
short selling -- a move unprecedented in the history of the public
markets. Further dramatizing the suits is that they are seeking "class
action status." Recently, 60 Minutes covered the allegedly doctored
negative reports issued by a hedge fund-friendly research firm on Biovail
Corp. In another high profile case, Overstock.com Inc. has had recent
success in its claims against prominent hedge funds. Skewed stories
containing false information issued by major financial publications have
led to SEC subpoenas of journalists. The NASD fined a broker at Citigroup
on Wednesday for naked short selling. Senator Bennett of Utah made it the
primary topic of his testimony with SEC Commissioner Christopher Cox in
this week's Senate Banking Committee hearings. The scope of the problem is
becoming more evident with each passing day, and we are hopeful that this
new visibility will result in an environment where we can work together to
correct the system, and insure a future level playing field for all honest
participants.

Why is Circle Group Holdings fighting back?

We'd like you to understand more about our motivation to confront this
challenge, versus maintaining the Wall Street status quo. When a company's
value is destroyed by these secretive and illegal methods, funding can dry
up, investors can lose faith in their investment, and companies can be
driven into bankruptcy or be de-listed. This is the ultimate goal of many
of these types of manipulations, because once a company is bankrupt or
de-listed the culprits have no liability to ever cover their short
position, and they also have no taxable event with the Internal Revenue
Service. This is free money -- and a lot of it -- for those industry
insiders who have figured out how to steal investor dollars by utilizing
serious flaws in our capital markets system.

We are sickened by these abuses, and have begun our own campaign to
protect the value of your investment in CXN stock. We believe in the fair,
fundamental principals of free trade and the entrepreneurial spirit upon
which our nation was built, and we have committed to working to restore
what has been taken from all of us. We are forcing this problem out into
the open and will be exposing the wrongdoers and manipulators.

What is Circle Group Holdings doing to address this situation?

The only way to correct the problem is to root out the phantom shares and
create an environment where the unscrupulous players cannot continue their
abusive trading. We are implementing several steps to make this happen:

1) In order to ensure success in our mission and adequate future
protection from market abuses, we have engaged legendary attorney John
O'Quinn, and his Consortium, led day-to-day by Wes Christian. O'Quinn and
his network represent Overstock.com, and many other companies facing these
problems, and have one of the most successful track records in the world
of fighting and monetizing injustices arising from abuses of power and
trust committed by large, influential special interests.

2) We are requesting that you contact your broker at this time, and
request that your physical certificate of CXN shares be sent to you.

3) Our pending name change (which shareholders will have the right to
approve via the special meeting we recently announced) will provide an
opportunity for everyone to find out whether they own genuine or phantom
shares. If the name change to Z-Trim Holdings, Inc. is approved, we will
simultaneously change our trading symbol to AMEX: ZTM, receive a new cusip
number, and issue new physical certificates. A new ZTM share with a new
cusip number will replace the old CXN share, on a share-for-share basis,
upon presentation of a legitimate CXN certificate. We have received our
Transfer Journal from our Transfer Agent documenting all issued
certificates. With this accurate record in-hand of all share issuances and
transfers to date, we believe phantom shares will be unable to transfer to
legitimate shares in the future. Holders who deliver genuine shares with
proof of ownership will receive the new ZTM share under a 'Mandatory
Exchange' program that the American Stock Exchange provides. We believe
the program allows the market to trade our stock without interruption but
can prevent settlement without physical delivery of genuine shares.

4) In the near future, we intend to issue a non-cusip dividend share known
as a "D-Share", on a one-for-one basis for each genuine ZTM share
presented directly to the Company within a designated period of time.
Holders of the D-share will receive a pro-rata cash dividend from 10% of
the after-tax profits from future licensing of the Z-Trim process to
global food manufacturers for as long as the shares are held by the
original holder - but the D-share dissolves immediately upon sale or
transfer of the associated ZTM share. D-shares WILL NOT be issued to
nominees. Likewise, IOUs and illegitimate phantom shares in circulation
will not be honored.

What is the purpose of the D-Share?

The D-Share is intended to provide future rewards to current legitimate
shareholders of record who retain their ownership interest. It will also
have the additional effect of allowing shareholders to ascertain whether
they own actual shares, or mere entitlements wholly lacking in the parcel
of rights represented by a legitimate share. The D-Share is one of the
rights a genuine share will carry in the future; hence in addition to
providing you a legitimate item of potential future value, it will also
ultimately provide a public integrity test of the system, in full view of
Congress and the investment community, with none of the usual deception
available to the malicious parties.

Management is bringing this ZTM and D-share program forward in a manner
that ensures:

-- There will be no way for any broker to simply credit a customer
account with the new shares;

-- Every shareholder has the opportunity to exercise their right to claim
a physical certificate;

-- As many legitimate shareholders as possible are able to claim
ownership of ZTM shares while causing as little disturbance as possible to
the market for ZTM shares.

Isn't this distracting to Circle Group Holding's management team?

Some of you may be concerned as to whether or not our actions represent a
shift of focus from our business, towards an emphasis on legal action and
market valuation. Oftentimes management teams are forced to choose between
running the business, and protecting their shareholders' interests. We
believe that is an unacceptable choice to have to make, and so instead
we've retained the O'Quinn Consortium as an experienced, seasoned team to
deal with that specialized area. An apt analogy is a large store -- it has
to be well run, well stocked and well marketed - but it also can't ignore
shoplifting, shipment hijacking, employee theft and embezzlement. Building
and managing a great business won't stop robbers, but a few well armed and
trained security specialists will. Please rest assured that we are
intensely and fully focused on our business. At the same time, we seek to
protect our shareholders' equity value from abuse.

What if I cannot obtain my stock certificate from my broker?

Ten trading days should be a reasonable timeframe to receive your physical
delivery of shares. Those of you who are unable to receive genuine shares
from your broker in a timely manner have likely been victims of abuse, and
are entitled to recourse and protection - you believed you purchased a
legitimate, genuine share, and through no fault of your own, you are now
unable to obtain it and get your ZTM share and your D-share. That is where
the Consortium led by John O'Quinn and Wes Christian will come into play.
This Consortium of attorneys and law firms can provide to shareholders who
cannot get their shares useful information about actions to take, what
documentation to prepare, and how best to present their complaints.
Shareholders having any difficulty receiving their physical certificate
from their broker may contact -

James 'Wes' Christian - Attorney
Christian Smith & Jewel
2302 Fannin, Suite 500
Houston, TX 77002
Phone: (713) 659-7617
jwc@csj-law.com

What about the wrongdoers?

This correspondence shall herewith serve as notice to those who have sold
our stock illegally, never delivering the underlying stock -- and creating
a "phantom float" of fraudulently manufactured IOUs. The O'Quinn-led
Consortium is now fully reviewing the key elements of activities engaged
in by our market participants, and documenting the scope and liability of
those actions, as well as the cost to the Company, and to our
shareholders. All efforts by participants to redeem phantom shares in CXN
will be closely monitored, and any such attempt will be met with swift and
vigorous action. Consider this fair warning that we intend to defend our
organization and our shareholders against any further abuse, and have the
resources necessary to do it.

We, as the issuer, have an exclusive right to control the number of
outstanding shares issued into the market. If you have been tricked into
believing that you actually own the shares in your account, and instead
there are IOUs represented to you as shares, you have a legitimate
complaint. The system cannot create shares of CXN -- only the Company is
authorized to do so. The market and its broker participants are not a
casino where the house can create as many aces of spades as it likes to
rig the game.

Our intention is to reward all genuine shareholders of record, and provide
a mechanism allowing those who have been defrauded to seek redress against
those who have defrauded them.

So here is your call to action ...

Demand your CXN shares, and if you are given any explanation or excuse
other than the prompt tendering of your shares, assume the worst, and
contact the aforementioned attorney, as well as the regulators listed at
the end of this document.

Our intent is to restore the integrity of the system's trading in our
stock, and protect our investors' interests. We remain totally focused on
our business, and have every expectation that the upcoming corporate
events related to this stock issuance will be adequately handled by the
O'Quinn Consortium, while we concentrate on the operations of the Company.

Thank you for your attention and continued support.

Best regards,
Your Management Team
At Circle Group Holdings

Where else can I get assistance if it appears I won't get my shares?

Illinois Securities Commission
69 West Washington,
12th Floor, Suite 1220
Chicago, IL 60602,
(312) 793-3384, (312) 793-1202 (Fax)

and/or

NASD Investor Complaint Center
1735 K Street, NW
Washington, DC 20006-1506
Phone: (240) 386-HELP (4357)
Fax: (866) 397-3290
Web site: complaint.nasd.com

Or Contact the State Securities Regulator in your state.
You can find contact information for your state regulator at the Web site,
nasaa.org

For more information about the Failure to Deliver and Naked Short Selling
situation, go to -

thesanitycheck.com ncans.net

Congressmen and Congresswoman are invited to contact any of the parties
listed above or the Company representatives listed below regarding this
issue.

Contact:
Steve Cohen - President
Circle Group Holdings, Inc.
1011 Campus Drive
Mundelein, IL 60060
847-549-6002

About our Company
Z-Trim is the Company's solution to obesity originally developed by the
USDA, which was first offered for licensing to the commercial marketplace
in 2000.

Obesity is the biggest health problem in the world today, in terms of
cost, and declining quality of life. In 2002, the Company acquired the
global rights to all fields of use for Z-Trim -- a zero-calorie, all
natural fat-replacement that can reduce up to 50% of the calories from
fats in most foods without affecting taste, texture, appearance, or
digestive health. We spent nearly 10 million dollars over the past four
years building a commercially-viable, licensable manufacturing process,
the first ever Z-Trim manufacturing plant, a powerful marketing plan, and
a substantial intellectual property portfolio. We recently raised several
million more dollars to market Z-Trim, which was one of the last steps we
needed to complete prior to being able to establish our important role in
solving the fast growing global obesity epidemic.

Z-Trim is currently being sold internationally to small and large
manufacturers for pilot production and laboratory formulation in many
different food applications. Additionally, Z-Trim is market-testing in
domestic school lunch programs. And the Z-Trim formulation team 'Amazing
Food Creations' is creating a line of emulsified products for many
nationally and regionally known brands.

Our Company is debt-free, we own all of our assets, the 'Going Concern'
was recently eliminated from the financial statement of our annual report,
and we truly believe we have a critical breakthrough in weight control and
obesity reversal. Investors in the Company own part of this, and we are
proud to have you as one of our owners. You share in our success with the
many people at our company headquarters in Mundelein who work diligently
every day to build a future that honors the tremendous persistence,
resources and capital that went into Z-Trim over the past several years to
make it a reality.

For Public relations requests related to the issues raised above --
Contact Wes Christian - Attorney at (713) 659-7617

For Investor Information related to the ZTM - CXN Mandatory Exchange
Program -
Contact Steve Cohen - President of CXN at (847) 549-6002

For Public relations requests related to Z-Trim, our solution to obesity -
Contact Phil Versten - V.P. of Public Relations at Z-Trim at (847) 549-
6002 or
Visit z-trim.com

Forward-Looking Statements and Risk Factors
Statements made in this letter that relate to future plans, events or
performances are forward-looking statements. Any statement containing
words such as "believes," "anticipates," "plans," or "expects," and other
statements which are not historical facts contained in this release are
forward-looking, and these statements involve risks and uncertainties and
are based on current expectations. Consequently, actual results could
differ materially from the expectations expressed in these forward-looking
statements. Reference is made to the Company's filings with the Securities
and Exchange Commission for a more complete discussion of such risks and
uncertainties.

[End of letter]

About Z-Trim
Z-Trim is a natural zero calorie fat-substitute made from the hulls of corn, oat, soy, rice, barley that lowers 25% to 50% of calories from fats in most foods without affecting taste or texture. Z-Trim generally can't be detected by consumers when formulated correctly in dairy, dressings, dips, sauces, baked goods, processed meats, snack foods, cookies, pies, cakes, icings, brownies, bars, ice cream, milk shakes and many other foods. It improves texture significantly; makes meats juicier, baked goods moister, dips creamier. Z-Trim lets you to eat more of the foods you love without fear of weight gain and allows you to lose weight without giving up the foods you love. Z-Trim adopts the flavor and mouth feel of most recipes and reduces aftertaste in most foods and has been proven in studies that a majority of consumers prefer Z-Trim foods over their full-fat counterparts. Z-Trim can substantially reduce harmful trans and saturated fats and adds healthy insoluble and soluble dietary fiber which can be beneficial to heart patients and diabetics. Z-Trim can improve digestion without any negative side effects sometimes associated with other fat substitutes. Invented over many years by Outstanding Senior Research Scientist Dr. George Inglett thesoydailyclub.com at the United States Department of Agriculture, Z-Trim is protected by three issued U.S. and International patents with more than 50 additional patents pending.

Forward-Looking Statements and Risk Factors

Statements made in this news release that relate to future plans, events or performances are forward-looking statements. Any statement containing words such as "believes," "anticipates," "plans," or "expects," and other statements which are not historical facts contained in this release are forward-looking, and these statements involve risks and uncertainties and are based on current expectations. Consequently, actual results could differ materially from the expectations expressed in these forward-looking statements. Reference is made to the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission for a more complete discussion of such risks and uncertainties.

Contact: Steve Cohen

Voice: 847-549-6002

Email: ir@crgq.com

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: Circle Group Holdings, Inc.



To: rrufff who wrote (2040)5/1/2006 1:09:02 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 2595
 
On The SABEW Conference, And The Arrogance Of Unbridled Power
Location: Blogs Bob O'Brien's Sanity Check Blog
Posted by: bobo 4/30/2006
"The more they attack us, you know, we have barrels of ink and stacks of money, and all the resources in the World at our disposal, legal, and via our media, to crush them..."

Was this Khrushchev speaking to his massed troops, announcing that he would ride roughshod over all who dared oppose him?

Hitler stoking the fires of his army, as they prepared to go against the Soviet army?

Nope.

That is Dan Colarusso, New York Post. He was on a panel with Herb Greenberg and Joe Nocera, at the SABEW conference (Society of American Business Editors and Writers) speaking about how the media is being attacked by those mean old bloggers.

I'm not making this up.

The transcript is filled with such gems, such glimpses of the actual way that the media perceives itself. Occasionally, betwixt the acrimonious sniveling and whining about victimhood, the true nature of the unbridled arrogance of these people slips through, and one is left with quotes like the above.

We are all-powerful, and will crush all before us into submission.

Now, that is veiled, carefully concealed from our prying eyes, for the most part, but occasionally one of the panelists tells it like it is - and the picture isn't pretty.

Here's the full quote - it is actually even better than just the snippet:

"When I think about Patrick Byrne or the guys at Biovail, I mean, second-rate CEOs of third-rate companies. We hunt big fish at the Post. We, you know, Dick Parsons reads us first in the morning, Dick Foll (sp?) reads us first in the morning; we don't really care for these companies. I wouldn't really cover them except that one of my reporters whom I happen to respect has an interest in them. So we write about them and we think its an interesting story. But I could give or take it. I'd rather have a great story about Goldman Sachs.

But they are interesting, people should know about them. The more they attack us, you know, we have barrels of ink and stacks of money, and all the resources in the World at our disposal, legal, and via our media, to crush them, or at least bring them to some degree where they cannot do this with impunity. And, at this point in time, the Post's stance. I'm ready to sue one of them for libel or slander. Why not turn the tables? They say you can't do it. Herb said he thought about it. But why not? They want to be journalists? You want to write for the public? Here you go, now you know what we live through. And.. fine, we'll wage war with you as long as you want.

So we're very much prepared to do these things and be aggressive. But one thing we're not prepared to do, and the one thing I have advised our reporters to do, is not to deal with these people on their own terms. We do not refer.. we do not post to boards anymore. In fact, I told Roddy Boyd that I would cut his hands off if another one of his emails showed up on the Web. It's careless, and we don't know what road we are going down litigation wise. Is an email from a journalist. can that be.. can you be sued for libel in an email? You know, I don't know where it goes. And, so were being careful about that. We're not going to engage these people on their own terms. We know the rules and we know where everything shapes up.

So that's basically my response to this. Again, these are small companies, the ones that Herb's been knocked around with a little bit, they're small companies and they're not important to what I do in the course of a day, unless we write about them. And we're prepared to take them on wherever they'd like to be taken on, primarily court, if it comes to that."

Wow. So this bastion of freedom of speech indicates that they will use their superior economic resources to crush those who criticize them, in order to raise the cost of that free speech to a level where all those who dare mock or criticize them are effectively silenced by the threat of lawsuits.

That, my friends, is what we are actually dealing with. The unbridled arrogance of this perspective is breathtaking. And the hypocrisy is stunning. I mean, on the one hand, they are collectively mewling about their being victims of persecution, and on the other, we get a candid view of how they view the superior resources they command - instruments to "crush" their critics and any who dare expose them.

Take some time to digest that part of it, and let's move to the rest of it. I'll post the full transcript later on in the week - for now, I am simply savoring each nugget, wondering what to write about next.

But I digress.

In another section Calaruso takes pains to distance himself from the Page 6 guy who was allegedly extorting business personalities, based upon that smugly superior ability to leverage the publication's power and connections in the media - you know, the ability to tar and feather a guy or company by putting out the word to kindreds in the financial press to do so - to "crush" whoever the unfortunate target is. And yet, for a brief moment, we see that perspective is not an anomaly. It is not atypical at all.

Tut tut, I could go on for hours at the implications and contradictions in just those few words, but why belabor it. Let's move on to the rest of the quote's message, and tone.

First, we have a guy who probably has never been more than CEO of his checkbook, pronouncing those who have built billion-dollar companies to be second rate. Now, that's fine, opinions are like journalists - there are many flavors. But understand that this guy has never been a CEO. He is an editor. Who is discussing how best to silence and crush his opponents. I still can't get past that part. But I'll try.

He then advises his staff not to deal with "these people" on their own terms. Presumably that is where they are accountable for their statements, just as their targets are.

I actually agree with him regarding the email thing - I believe that the email exchange between the Businessweek reporter and Dr. Byrne of OSTK is a fascinating glimpse of how the supposedly unbiased press operate - but it is not flattering to the press to be exposed in that manner, and they should take care to preserve their veneer of civility and not allow the laymen to see how they actually go about their job.

There is much, much more in this - more Herb than one could wish for, charming examples of the insider boy's club which certain segments of the NY financial press clearly are members of, further demonstrations of how the press views its role.

We will crush those who dare oppose us.

What do you say to that?

----------

Last week, a broker at Citi was sanctioned by the NASD for mis-marking his naked shorted transactions as long sales, in order to circumvent the short selling restrictions, and presumably not have his orders show up in the legitimate short interest.

This is precisely what I have been opining occurs, much more frequently than anyone believes. The industry hides its naked short selling by lying.

Simple.

What is noteworthy is that it hasn't gotten very much press. Here is a broker for one of the major prime brokers, who performed 100 trades, not ONE of which was flagged or caught by the system.

How large were the trades? Thousands, or hundreds of thousands of shares? Who were the companies? Were they companies like CXN, who can't be shorted? Or were they OSTK shares - a company on the SHO list, where short selling is supposedly tightly restricted?

We don't know. That is secret.

Why is it secret? Again, we don't know. Presumably because if we knew, it would expose Citi to lawsuits from companies and shareholders harmed by the practice - and we can't have that.

So we aren't told.

And note that even though this is a breach of many of the rules that create a pretense of market integrity, the broker didn't even have to admit guilt. He was suspended for 90 days, and had to disgorge a chunk of cash, and pay a fine, but he is not going to jail.

This is our market.

And then we wonder when companies like CXN take the position that they are getting reamed by the industry, and that the same brokers whose staff violate the rules designed to protect investors, while the industry rolls its eyes and takes the position that, "That can't happen - it's against the rules!"

I mean, what kind of a farce is it when 100 trades, ostensibly sizable, can be mis-marked, and NOBODY BATS AN EYE?

Is it just me, or is it increasingly apparent that if you commit larcenous acts on Wall Street, the worst that can happen is you may have to spend a month or two on vacation?

WTF? WTFF?


Copyright ©2006 Bob O'Brien
Permalink | Trackback

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments (17) Add Comment
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: On The SABEW Conference, And The Arrogance Of Unbridled Power By mhatmccane on 5/1/2006
Truly amazing! Is this the conference that Chris Cox is supposed to be at?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: On The SABEW Conference, And The Arrogance Of Unbridled Power By bobo on 5/1/2006
Yes it is.

You should read the Herb stuff. Really astounding. But nothing compares to that one quote from the Post. It pretty much says it all.

I was pretty clear on what he was trying to convey. Didn't have any questions.

You?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: On The SABEW Conference, And The Arrogance Of Unbridled Power By harryofanguslane on 5/1/2006
What a Hoot! The guys think they're oh, so Powerful. Deja vu all over again. When the Government gets on to them, their masters (the publishers and owners) will leave them hanging, twisting slowly in the breeze.

I've said it so often and I'll say it again. Hubris is the most dangerous word in the English language. Even if it's Greek.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: On The SABEW Conference, And The Arrogance Of Unbridled Power By Clearthinker on 5/1/2006
CITI broker is a smoking gun....if he did it 100 times over 19 months...how many thousands of trades were done this way by others.....

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: On The SABEW Conference, And The Arrogance Of Unbridled Power By troydian on 5/1/2006
I have decieded to pummell my senator everyday with choice pieces of info If any of you would like to make a differnce..an e-mail a day to your elected official could be the straw that gets the camel OFF ehhs arse!! ^6 days in a row on this particular charge of the light brigade..... by the way I have been doing this for 3 years... all in an effort to seek justice.. I have already lost everything and I do mean everything...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: On The SABEW Conference, And The Arrogance Of Unbridled Power By troydian on 5/1/2006
well.. exept for my will to FIGHT!!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: On The SABEW Conference, And The Arrogance Of Unbridled Power By Wonder Boy on 5/1/2006
Is this the first of the fallout from the subpoenas to the media or just another Cox management move???

Senior SEC Enforcement Official Joins Kroll's San Francisco Office
Business Wire - May 01, 2006 11:30

SAN FRANCISCO, May 01, 2006 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- Kathleen Bisaccia, former assistant district administrator for the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's Division of Enforcement in San Francisco, Calif., has joined the San Francisco office of risk consulting company Kroll Inc. As a managing director in its Business Intelligence & Investigations division, she is responsible for conducting corporate internal investigations in all areas of the federal securities laws, including financial reporting, Sarbanes-Oxley compliance, and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Bisaccia will also oversee projects involving due diligence and other regulatory issues.

Bisaccia began her career at the SEC in 1991, when she joined its Los Angeles office as a staff attorney. She subsequently served as branch chief for four years, and following a move to the San Francisco office, as senior counsel and branch chief. Most recently, in March 2005, she assumed the senior position of assistant district administrator. In that capacity, she supervised enforcement managers and staff in all aspects of complex securities law investigations and litigation, including strategy, legal analysis, evidence collection and analysis, case planning, and evaluation of legal theories. Bisaccia also served as director of equities enforcement at the Pacific Stock Exchange in early 2000.

About Kroll: Kroll Inc., the world's leading risk consulting company, provides a broad range of investigative, intelligence, financial, security and technology services to help clients reduce risks, solve problems and capitalize on opportunities. Headquartered in New York with offices in more than 65 cities in over 25 countries, Kroll has a multidisciplinary corps of more than 3,900 employees and serves a global clientele of law firms, financial institutions, corporations, non-profit institutions, government agencies, and individuals. For more information, visit www.kroll.com.

SOURCE: Kroll Inc.

Kroll



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: On The SABEW Conference, And The Arrogance Of Unbridled Power By rtway1 on 5/1/2006
I hope somebody sends or hand delivers the transscript of this to Mr. Cox head of the SEC, and I would also bet he or his staff read this blog site. If in fact his eyes do glaze over these quotes you have provided, and I deeply appreciate your providing the info, he should hang his head in shame for his public display of concern for these merchants of misery. Every day I am more convinced that this government is on a full time mission to keep the public uninformed and ignorant about the financial world so that they can be used like animals for slaughter to feed the appetites of the Wall St. club. Maybe someday,God willing, someone will emerge to power to clean up this system, currently the spot is certainly vacant.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: On The SABEW Conference, And The Arrogance Of Unbridled Power By bobo on 5/1/2006
It would be very interesting to ask her when she got the job offer?

Want to bet a lot of money it was after she initiated the investigation into the hedge funds, assuming it was she who did so?

Kroll. Didn't Byrne list them as one of the arms of the miscreants - a facilitator and dirt digger for the bad guys?

Can some journalist contact her and ask, point blank, when she got the offer?

This stinks bigtime.

Bigtime.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: On The SABEW Conference, And The Arrogance Of Unbridled Power By x. trapnell on 5/1/2006
Utter amazing quotation, fully in Tom Wolfe territory, worthy of becoming a permanent part of the lore of Wall Street. So rabid that it even manages to rehabilitate Boyd a bit. Even if he had been so inclined, no way that the NASAA November meeting could have been covered under this NY Post editor. No wonder Roddy had to pay for his own travel there.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: On The SABEW Conference, And The Arrogance Of Unbridled Power By rtway1 on 5/1/2006
the only person in the media that has tremendous public exposure that has taken on a jihad against the elitist, bashing and lying press is O,Reilly on Fox,s show the Factor. I give this man all the credit in the world for having the gonads to single out these scum by newspaper and by their own names. He has had his life threatened and actually has bodyguards. This is also the most watched news show and that means the public is eager to hear the truth. I wish that more stations would follow suit. I wish we could get him to see these comments.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: On The SABEW Conference, And The Arrogance Of Unbridled Power By InTheKnow on 5/1/2006
What a fuqing sham, what a fuqing rigged system, WTF,WTFF!

Let them all rot in hell!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: On The SABEW Conference, And The Arrogance Of Unbridled Power By rtway1 on 5/1/2006
Bob, is there anyway to get these quotes over to Leslie Stahl at 60 min. Maybe they will do a follow up on biovail or Ostk.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: On The SABEW Conference, And The Arrogance Of Unbridled Power By InTheKnow on 5/1/2006
The arrogance of a bunch of cretins that started out doing restaurant reviews. This is typical Hitlerism at it's finest. A bunch of power hungry malcontents that would be at home at a KKK meeting! What a bunch of scumbags.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: On The SABEW Conference, And The Arrogance Of Unbridled Power By notbobdavis on 5/1/2006
Do you have a link to the transcripts?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: On The SABEW Conference, And The Arrogance Of Unbridled Power By bobo on 5/1/2006
I will post the transcript in its entirety later in the week. There is no link. It is done based on audio from the conference.

Email Stahl this blog, and indicate that I have the transcript and would be more than willing to share it. Stunning stuff.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: On The SABEW Conference, And The Arrogance Of Unbridled Power By bidrec on 5/1/2006
One thing that should be remarked here is the temerity of the Post has in calling another business "third rate" when, based on estimates of the New York Times, it loses about seventy million dollars a year.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Your name:
Title:
Comment:

Add Comment Cancel







Copyright © 2006 The Sanity Check | Privacy Statement | Terms Of Use



To: rrufff who wrote (2040)5/2/2006 1:56:02 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 2595
 
SEC SUES HEDGE FUND ADVISER DEEPHAVEN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC AND FORMER PORTFOLIO MANAGER BRUCE LIEBERMAN FOR INSIDER TRADING BEFORE PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT OF PIPE OFFERINGS

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Litigation Release No. 19683 / May 2, 2006
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Deephaven Capital Management, LLC and Bruce Lieberman, Civil Action No. 1:06CV00805 (D.D.C.)

SEC SUES HEDGE FUND ADVISER DEEPHAVEN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC AND FORMER PORTFOLIO MANAGER BRUCE LIEBERMAN FOR INSIDER TRADING BEFORE PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT OF PIPE OFFERINGS

Defendants Agree to Injunction and Payout of $5.8 Million in Penalties and Disgorgement
The Securities and Exchange Commission today filed a civil injunctive action against hedge fund adviser Deephaven Capital Management, LLC and its former portfolio manager Bruce Lieberman, charging them with insider trading from August 2001 to March 2004 on the information that 19 private investment in public equity (PIPE) stock offerings were about to be publicly announced. In each case, the company's stock price fell on the announcement of its PIPE offering. The defendants learned confidential material nonpublic details about the upcoming PIPE offerings from placement agents for the companies and sold short the company shares on behalf of the Deephaven Small Cap Growth Fund, LLC, profiting from the price decline when the PIPE offerings were publicly announced. Short selling includes the practice of selling borrowed shares in the expectation that the price will fall, enabling the seller to then buy and deliver the shares at a lower price.

The Commission's complaint, filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, alleges that Deephaven and Lieberman violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act) and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws. The complaint alleges that:

In each of 19 PIPE offerings, a broker-dealer retained by the company as placement agent advised Lieberman or his assistant of the upcoming offering and that the information was confidential nonpublic information. In each case, Deephaven and Lieberman had a duty to maintain the information in confidence and to refrain from trading in the company's shares;

In four of the offerings, the placement agent used a written telephone script that alerted Deephaven that knowledge of the PIPE offering was confidential and could be considered material nonpublic information;

In one offering, the placement agent cautioned Lieberman's assistant by letter about the obligation under the federal securities laws not to trade in the company's securities while in possession of material nonpublic information. Lieberman was alerted to the confidential nonpublic nature of the information when he signed a securities purchase agreement in which the company characterized the PIPE shares offering as material nonpublic information, yet he shorted the company's stock on 13 different days before public announcement of the PIPE offering; and

In two of the PIPE offerings, Lieberman falsely signed a written security purchase agreement expressly warranting that the Small Cap Growth Fund had not shorted the company's stock; he transferred short positions the fund had in fact taken to another Deephaven fund he controlled, in an attempt to hide the short sales in violation of the warranties.
Deephaven and Lieberman have each consented, without admitting or denying the allegations in the complaint, to final judgments permanently enjoining them from violating Securities Act Section 17(a) and Exchange Act Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5. Deephaven also agreed to disgorge $2,683,270 in unlawful profits, plus $343,418 prejudgment interest, and to pay a $2,683,270 civil penalty. Lieberman agreed to pay a $110,000 civil penalty and to a Commission order barring him from associating with any investment adviser, with the right to reapply after three years, in an administrative proceeding to be instituted based on entry of the anticipated final judgment.

SEC Complaint in this matter



sec.gov

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Home | Previous Page Modified: 05/02/2006



To: rrufff who wrote (2040)5/3/2006 10:47:15 AM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2595
 
"Infotopia investors already are familiar with JagNotes. Valentine and Thomson Kernaghan managed to steer funds toward JagNotes by arranging for Infotopia to purchase "airtime" for its infomercials on that Company's marginally existent financial news network."

Mark Valentine - Paying With Pennies

Investigative Reports
May 2 2006
The long-arm of the FBI has reached out and grabbed Mark Valentine. Valentine was arrested at the Frankfurt, Germany airport on August 14th; the result of a two-year investigation by U.S. and Canadian law enforcement agencies.

The arrest marks the latest dark chapter for Valentine, whose securities license recently was suspended by the Ontario Securities Commission (OSC). The OSC is examining Valentine's conduct while serving as Chairman of Canadian brokerage house, Thomson Kernaghan & Co. Ltd. See, Not Exactly Valentine's Day; and Thomson Kernaghan & Co. Ltd. – Time To Giddy Up and Go.

Stock Patrol started asking questions about those activities in January 2001, when we first noticed that Valentine's firm, Thomson Kernaghan, had been receiving millions upon millions of shares of Infotopia, Inc. at a deep discount. Those shares were quickly registered, putting Thomson Kernaghan in a position to dump them while Infotopia was projecting profits that were largely illusory, and acquisitions that never came to pass. See Infotopia – Bye Bye Shares.

Now Valentine is facing the possibility of a lengthy jail term as was one of 58 defendants charged in the FBI's sting operation - dubbed "Bermuda Short." Other named defendants included stockbrokers, promoters and public companies.

Prosecutors say that the "corporate terrorists" participated in fraudulent schemes – set up by the FBI - involving the sale of $200 million in securities of twenty three publicly traded companies. According to the United States Attorneys Office, no members of the public lost money because the schemes were carefully controlled by the government.

The charges stemmed from two separate, but related, operations. In the first, an FBI agent posed as a trader for a fictitious foreign mutual fund. Using that guise he enticed corporate executives and stockbrokers to sell him large blocks of stock at above-market prices, resulting in huge profits for the sellers. In return, the sellers agreed to pay secret kickbacks to the agent.

In a second scheme, an FBI agent and a member of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police posed as members of a Columbian drug cartel who wanted to launder drug money. They convinced several of the defendants to launder a total of $1.4 million.

The charges against Valentine, and others (including Paul Lemon and Andrew Proctor, directors of Voyager Group, Inc, a Bermuda-based financial services firm) involved a scheme to dump shares of three OTC Bulletin Board companies that Valentine allegedly controlled: C-Me-Run Inc., SoftQuad Software Ltd. and JagNotes.

Authorities say that Valentine and Lemon conspired to sell $29.4 million worth of stock in those three companies through the FBI's phony mutual fund trader, agreeing to pay kickbacks of $7.8 million to the trader, and his colleagues.

Infotopia investors already are familiar with JagNotes. Valentine and Thomson Kernaghan managed to steer funds toward JagNotes by arranging for Infotopia to purchase "airtime" for its infomercials on that Company's marginally existent financial news network.

According to the criminal complaint, Valentine and other defendants also persuaded stockbrokers to manipulate stock prices by convincing their customers to buy securities. Those stockbrokers were promised kickbacks in return for their efforts.

U.S. officials intend to move forward with efforts to extradite Valentine. This time his trip is not likely to end at the Frankfurt airport.

IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FOR STOCKPATROL.COM, CONTACT US AT editor@stockpatrol.com

All content © 2005 StockPatrol.com. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Contact Us



To: rrufff who wrote (2040)5/4/2006 11:11:14 AM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 2595
 
MAD MONEY' CRAMER HITS $1M

By KEITH J. KELLY



May 4, 2006 -- Just call him Little Big Man.
James Cramer, the acerbic co-founder of The- Street.com and crazed financial news commentator on CNBC's "Mad Money," saw his compensation from the online news service surge dramatically in 2005, according to the company's proxy.

What's more, next year he'll be hauling in $1 million in salary alone from TheStreet.com.

In 2005, Cramer's salary jumped 25 percent from $400,000 to $500,000. And it's slated to jump to $750,000 this year.



He also continues to reap $450,000 a year from CBS Radio for his show.

"If you look at the company's revenue and ask yourself how much of that is there because of him, it's cheap," said Douglas McIntyre, a former board member of TheStreet.com.

The news about his Street.com compensation came even as other executives, including CEO Thomas J. Clarke and President James Lonergan, saw compensation drop last year.

"Cramer is absolutely necessary for The- Street.com," said McIntyre. "He's like a franchise ballplayer."

Clarke's base stayed steady at $356,000, but his bonus dropped to $124,600 and he was granted 45,000 restricted stock units.

With the stock up almost 60 percent this year, that's a nice bonus.

Analysts said much of TheStreet's success was due to Cramer, whose madcap appearances bring visitors to the site.

"Would you rather pay Cramer $1 million," asked said Frank Gristina, an analyst at Avondale Partners, "or spend $10 million on marketing?"



To: rrufff who wrote (2040)5/8/2006 2:06:00 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 2595
 
Cloud of short selling
Companies say they want to uncover the dirty truth of so-called naked transactions
By Bob Mims
The Salt Lake Tribune
sltrib.com

Illustration for short selling

Wall Street's reaction was swift and vitriolic last August when Overstock.com CEO Patrick Byrne unveiled what he called the Miscreants Ball - an alleged conspiracy to drive down his company's stock.
Frivolous. Erratic behavior. Off the deep end, various analysts and financial scribes hooted. Others insisted that Byrne was the leader of the "tinfoil hat" brigade, or at least one of those "overeducated weirdos" looking for market windmills to tilt.
Flash forward nine months, and Byrne's claims aren't so quickly dismissed - and he is hardly alone in making them. A spate of lawsuits from other companies have followed, and the Securities and Exchange Commission has begun its own investigations related to the practice Byrne hates most: manipulative, or naked, short selling.
Short selling is legal - a bet, using borrowed stocks, that share prices will fall, allowing "shorts" to pocket the difference when they do. Naked shorting, though illegal, occurs when the same transaction is attempted without first borrowing real shares.
"We're making a lot of progress in this war," Byrne says today. "Everyone seems to finally be getting it - that I'm right. We've passed the tipping point on this debate. The rock I rolled up the hill is now rolling on its own."
In his watermark webcast, Byrne painted a picture of market researchers timing negative reports about his online closeout retailer to aid client hedge funds in subsequent massive shorting -even naked shorting - of his stocks.
It was a conspiracy, Byrne said, in which a shadowy "Sith Lord" - an otherwise unidentified financial criminal mastermind - profited by manipulating small companies' stocks into oblivion. The day before Byrne's multimedia presentation, Overstock had filed suit in Marin County, Calif., against Gradient Analytics, a frequent critic of his company, and Rocker Partners, a hedge fund that had begun shorting Overstock's shares in early 2004.
The Marin County Superior Court suit alleges that the defendants had together "orchestrated a wide-scale predatory campaign" against Overstock, contributing to a share price slide from a high of $77.18 in January 2005; shares have traded in the $24-$29 range in recent weeks.
Both companies deny the charges, and Gradient is appealing a judge's March decision to allow Overstock's libel and unfair business practices claim to proceed to trial.
Neither Rocker nor Gradient would answer questions for this story, citing litigation that also includes a similar suit against Gradient by the Canadian pharmaceutical company Biovail.
Earlier this month, naked short selling also was at the core of lawsuits against prime brokers. In a notable switch, 11 Wall Street firms - among them Bank of America, Bear Stearns and Citygroup - were sued by hedge funds, claiming those institutions were the real culprits behind failures to deliver borrowed stocks, resulting in naked shorting.

A serious issue
Although hardly unanimous about the seriousness of the threat short selling poses, traders, academics, analysts and financial journalists are affording the topic more than the quick derision and dismissal so common just nine months ago.
"Nobody really knows for sure how much naked shorting is going on," says Tad Borek, a San Francisco investment adviser, attorney and contributor to AllExperts.com. "But I don't think these conspiracy theories ring true, either."
Borek argues that in the end, markets right themselves and naked shorts eventually must settle their accounts.
However, he admits that the Depository Trust and Clearing Corp., or DTCC, the primary clearinghouse for such trades, is not perfect and often seems slow in forcing settlements.
"As an investor, I have a lot of faith in the market," Borek adds. "For every hedge fund trying to drive down stock prices, there's another ready to pounce on them to buy stock that has gone down too far."
Dave Young, president of Provo-based Paragon Capital Management, says shorting is a must-have technique in any serious trader's tool kit.
"It's part of having a totally efficient market [and] we've used short selling here for years," he adds, but warns that its timing comes down to minutes, even seconds. Few investors succeed with shorting unless they develop a sense of when to return to "long" tactics - the traditional buy low, sell high approach.
Although Young argues true naked shorting is rare, because perpetrators ultimately flirt with prison time, he allows that the illegal practice "can be a company killer."
Remember the fall of scandal-plagued Enron? "With all its issues, its stock went down - and the shorts stayed with it, all the way down," Young says.

Attacking abuse
Byrne, who says phantom shares of Overstock at one point were traded at a rate more than double the actual shares in existence, joins others in declaring naked shorting to be out of control. But opinions on the extent of the practice vary widely.
Last month, the DTCC acknowledged that 1.5 percent of the dollar volume of stocks traded daily end up "fails to deliver," or FTDs. In all, those FTDs - dubbed "counterfeit" stocks by shorting foes - can tally as high as $6 billion a day.
Regulators, private and public, have drawn fire from such Byrne fellow travelers as the grass-roots National Coalition Against Naked Shorting for ignoring the problem. The agencies, though, insist that they take the allegations seriously.
Steve Luparello, executive vice president for market regulations with the National Association of Securities Dealers, says regulators "have long recognized the potential for substantial failures-to-deliver-on-sales could aggregate in a single stock over periods of time."
However, such stock manipulation "has proved a very difficult thing to prove. . . . We needed a more ethnical, easily defined set of rules to enforce," Luparello adds.
He and other market regulators believe they got much of that with the new Regulation SHO, a January 2005 addition to SEC rules that tracks stocks considered most abused by naked shorts.
A regular on that "Threshold Security List" has been Overstock. Under SHO, no company should be listed for more than 13 days; Overstock long ago passed 200, Byrne says.
Still, Luparello argues that overall, FTD abuse is in retreat. "It may not have completely eliminated failures-to-deliver, but I would not gloss over the fact that the numbers of stocks on the threshold list declined over a period of time."

Inconsistent enforcement
SEC spokesman John Nester notes that since the advent of Regulation SHO, the average of threshold-qualifying FTDs - failures-to-deliver on 10,000


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Advertisement


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



or more shares - has dipped nearly 31 percent. Actual numbers of companies on the list daily have declined more than 35 percent.
"Put another way, 99 percent of all trades, by dollar value, settle on time without incident," Nester says, adding that the SEC is working to further tighten monitoring and enforcement.
Theoretically, Regulation SHO requires brokers to close out all threshold-list FTDs by purchasing the supposedly borrowed stocks themselves. Until those transactions are cleared, such brokers are supposed to be barred from further short sales in that particular stock.
In practice, the requirement often fails. It can take several weeks to catch up with FTDs, while some brokers are allowed to continue shorting.
Karl Thiel, a Portland, Ore., investment manager who writes for the Motley Fool column, would like more effective enforcement. He has recently opined that the threshold list has done little more than "turn rampant abuse into a spectator sport" without violators being called to accounts.
"No one, including the DTCC, seems to be able to answer the question of how much naked shorting is out there," he told The Salt Lake Tribune. "[But] I certainly think it makes sense for the SEC to look into the trading around companies with persistent settlement failures."
Still, Thiel suspects naked shorting is not the major curse on markets some envision. It "might cause some market distortion around companies with high short demand, but I don't see evidence that naked shorting is destroying truth, justice and the American Way."

Who gets targeted
What makes a company attractive to shorts, legitimate and naked alike?
Mark Skousen, a nationally renowned economist, investor, professor and author of financial tomes based in Washington, D.C., suggests two categories:
First, shorts are lured to stocks that are grossly overvalued compared with their company's bottom line - think Google, which speculators propelled into the $475-per-share range this past January before dropping it by more than $100 within the ensuing six weeks.
Second, companies that are clearly in a down trend, with the investors grapevine warning of more bad news to come.
Skousen, who also runs his own hedge fund, does not hold any short positions - but he has in the past, and probably will in the future, depending on what opportunities develop.
"Short selling is extremely difficult and few are successful at it," he says. "Falling prices happen quickly, while bull [long] markets build over long periods of time."
Skousen sees tighter regulation as anathema. Another believer in the market righting itself, he says true naked short sellers inevitably reap the whirlwinds they sew.
"If you want to play such games, you will eventually get burned," he says. "If you oversold . . . that [nonexistent] stock will eventually bounce back on you."
Another believer in the ability of stocks to right themselves is Neil Harrington, who has run the Harrington Trading Co. out of Provo for 10 years. But he also thinks Byrne has a point when it comes to his fear and loathing of naked short selling.
"I do not discount that somebody, or group of somebodies, want to do damage to his business by artificially triggering an effect on his stock by selling short," he says. "If you have a big enough player, they could . . . bring on a cascade [short selling] effect."
If a targeted company proves financially sound, however, Harrington believes it will not only survive the short selling attacks, but thrive as long-term investors find attractive, lower prices to buy in.
Financial fundamentals are indeed key in any discussion of a company's short selling laments, says Gary Weiss, a veteran New York-based financial journalist and author of Wall Street Versus America: The Rampant Greed and Dishonesty That Imperil Your Investments (Portfolio, 2006).
Weiss remains among the still sizeable number of Wall Street observers skeptical of Byrne and other CEOs who complain of naked short selling, seeing their campaigns as cover for less-than-stellar earnings reports and questionable management.
Even ongoing SEC investigation related to Overstock's allegations does not change Weiss' view. Such probes only "demonstrate yet again the regulatory incompetence" of agencies charged with monitoring stock transactions, he says.
Convinced Regulation SHO is, despite criticisms, proving effective, he sees the claims of unbridled short selling as "wildly exaggerated" and "paranoid rubbish."
Adds Weiss: "It is a disgrace that regulators take these people seriously, and I believe that [it is] the funding and tactics of these people [that] should be investigated."
bmims@sltrib.com

A primer on short selling

Think of short selling as reverse investing. Instead of buying low to sell high (taking a "long" position), short sellers borrow stock from a broker and sell them on a bet that share prices will fall; when they do, they buy back the shares, return them to the broker, and pocket the difference between high and low prices.

Naked short selling is said to occur when an investor shorts a stock without first borrowing real shares. The result can be an artificially inflated volume and downward price pressures on stocks when "shorts" fail to deliver borrowed shares to cover their trades.

In March, the Depository Trust and Clearing Corp. reported that 1.5 percent of the dollar volume of stocks traded daily ends up "fails to deliver," or FTDs. In all, those FTDs run as high as $6 billion a day.

Overstock.com recently announced that while it had just under 8.9 million shares on deposit with the DTCC on March 10, short interest on its stock totaled nearly 9.6 million shares.