SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Road Walker who wrote (286266)5/4/2006 2:11:54 AM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575391
 
Warner brings his blunt talk to Seattle

By JOEL CONNELLY
P-I COLUMNIST

Seven weeks before being elected governor of Virginia in 2001, Mark Warner stood on the roof of his campaign headquarters in Alexandria and watched the Pentagon burn.

"It still burns me up when I hear Karl Rove accuse Democrats of having a 'pre-9/11 worldview,' " reflected Warner, who is exploring a presidential bid, during an interview in Seattle on Monday.

Warner, 51, left office in January, basking in the fact that 150,000 jobs were created in the Old Dominion -- in Washington, D.C., suburbs as well as in small rural towns -- under his watch.

The governor's 80 percent approval ratings boosted a fellow Democrat, Tim Kaine, to succeed him in a Republican-leaning state. It started buzz that Warner is best equipped to emerge as the alternative-to-Hillary candidate in the Democrats' 2008 race.

A co-founder of the cellular phone company that became Nextel, Warner sounds more like a driven, analytical business or foundation leader than a hail-fellow politician of either party.

He faults President Bush for intellectual laziness, in not asking tough questions about Iraq and failing to show much curiosity about a world economy that is turning at Internet speed.

"The job of an executive is not just to go along with subordinates," he said. "It is to ask the next question. It is to find a hole in the plan. It is to keep questioning until you are satisfied.

"You have to be relentless. And you must also be willing to hear bad news. It's true even if you have the policy right. This is a gang that can't shoot straight when it comes to execution."

Warner draws bipartisan inspiration.

He lauds the unceasing pressure that President Kennedy put on subordinates with the solution that avoided nuclear war in the Cuban missile crisis. He credits President Reagan with implementing "real changes" in his administration after the Iran-Contra crisis enveloped ideologues in his administration.

In Warner's view, bad judgment by ideologues has left America with a list of bad options in Iraq. Iraq was to have become "a shining beacon in the Middle East," a dream fast dying.

"A failed Iraqi state right now is not in America's interests," Warner said. "This war, at the beginning, did not have anything to do with al-Qaida. Now, Iraq could be a base for al-Qaida. At the beginning, our intervention had nothing to do with Iranian expansionism. Now, a failed Iraqi state could serve Iranian expansionism."

What to do? Warner would give Iraq's feuding politicians "weeks, not months" to form a viable government. They would get "months, not years," to show progress at achieving order.

"At least we should not leave Iraq a significantly more destabilizing force than before we went in," he added.

Warner is more anxious to talk economics and jobs.

He confronted a ballooning shortfall in Virginia, and cut $858 million out of the state budget. After that, however, he persuaded a Republican-run legislature to push through a tax reform plan that significantly boosted spending on education.

He is proud to have brought tech jobs to rural towns, and broadband capacity to southern Virginia counties.

Looking at national policy, Warner notes that the federal government spends about $2 billion a year on energy research and development -- but $7.1 billion a month on the Iraq war.

"We're 16th in the world in broadband development in this country: This is the country that invented the Internet," Warner said. "We seem to have no strategy at all. We should be moving aggressively to tell small towns, 'Your kid does not need to move to a big city to find a job.'

"We have not built a know ledge economy in this country. Small-town America, what hope has it gotten in the last 20 years? Back to the last two years of Clinton, we've accumulated years of lack of focus, of lack of attention to competitive policy."

In his days of seeding telecommunications firms, Warner came to Seattle to deal with the McCaw cellular phone empire -- a bastion of local Republicanism.

He was on a whirlwind schedule Monday, meeting and greeting Democrats, huddling with King County Executive Ron Sims, and raising money for his political committee.

And Tuesday, there was a morning trip to Microsoft -- for presidential aspirants, our political equivalent of a pilgrimage to Lourdes.

"I have Sacramento and San Jose this week, and Israel next week," he joked. "It is like the longest road show in the world."

Virginia was home to several of America's early, visionary presidents.

In the past half-century, it has veered from the "massive resistance" policy of Sen. Harry Byrd toward school desegregation to the election of an African American, Douglas Wilder, as governor.

Wilder made a brief, disorganized bid for the 1992 Democratic presidential nomination.

Another Virginian touted as White House timber, Sen. Charles Robb, saw his career mortally damaged by attendance at cocaine parties and controversy over how he spent time with former Miss Virginia Tai Collins alone in a hotel room. (An affair, she alleged. A rubdown, he claimed.)

Two more formidable Virginians are potential contenders in the wide-open 2008 race. Republican Sen. George Allen Jr. has national ambitions, but must first get re-elected.

Of Warner, Democratic strategist Frank Greer observed yesterday: "He is competent and knows how to succeed and how to actually accomplish things."

P-I columnist Joel Connelly can be reached at 206-448-8160 or joelconnelly@seattlepi.com.

seattlepi.nwsource.com



To: Road Walker who wrote (286266)5/4/2006 2:24:30 AM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1575391
 
One of the best articles on the subject...........

Why Impeachment is Essential

by Bill C. Davis
_____________________________________________________________

Say it and you’re told it won’t happen.

There’s a conscious rage and an unconscious self-defeating deference to the absoluteness of the power that caused the rage. Whether we know it or not we are devastated by that realization.

Impeachment: Impossible – stop thinking about it. Translated: We don’t matter. They know it and we know it. The “leaders” that perhaps, and in not a few minds, most likely, rigged two national elections, quite possibly allowed 9/11, definitely invaded Iraq and lied to do so, depleted the US treasury – or more specifically, redistributed the treasury to internal, private and corporate allies, sanctioned torture and domestic spying – those people can never be impeached or even investigated.

If we felt we owned the house, we’d say get out. But we don’t feel we own the house. We are reduced to squatters, who will grumble and pay fees for the plot of land allowed us, but we know now the land isn’t ours. We know the government and its treasury isn’t ours. So when someone says impeach – ie. evict – the response, even from the people who say it, is - not gonna happen.

But impeachment is essential. It is the remedy for, if one believes in it, the national soul. I think there is such a thing and it has material and physical manifestations. When it’s sick it demonstrates symptoms – when it’s healthy it yields harvests.

A legal and constitutional purge will return the sense of citizen ownership and spiritual health that was robbed along with election 2000. With that first theft all other thefts flowed. No - the clock can’t be turned back – dead soldiers can’t be brought back to life – flesh and blood limbs won’t grow back – the money to war profiteers most likely won’t be returned to the treasury – but the national soul, spirit, libido – whatever name we give the invisible American essence – that can be resuscitated and revived. And for that to begin to happen – impeachment is essential.

We are being surrounded by a world that doesn’t trust us anymore. They aren’t all hostile to us – they’ve lost faith in the power of the American people – and right to the point, as evidenced by comments such as “he should be impeached but it’s not going to happen” - we have lost faith in our own power.

It’s not personal. It’s not about how much we are embarrassed by or don’t like Bush. It has nothing to do with individual animosity and everything to do with collective power. When exit polls don’t match the official tally it doesn’t automatically mean that the time honored system of exit polls is suddenly unreliable, or that, as we were told, spouses were afraid to admit in front of each other who they voted for. It means something darker and more challenging. The American people did not take the challenge – we did what the coup expected we would do and we have been doing it ever since – until now.

We are at the “until now” moment. Democratic party leaders are uncomfortable talking about it. They think strategy. Impeachment is not a strategy. It’s a citizen action – a national correction – a collective redemption – an honest recall. It may happen city by city – state by state – but the body politic has the right, need, obligation to impeach.

"It’ll be over soon," is not good enough. "We’re at war," is no excuse. The war, as is now apparent, does not need, does not have, the president’s attention or wisdom. His job on that front is done – he sent the troops in. That was his role as defined by the Constitution and commandeered by criminality. The war is no longer his to orchestrate or end so if he goes, the war won’t notice, except in one way.


Extremist forces may not change their agenda toward us but the angry disappointed moderate elements may reconsider. Proving to that section of the world population that America is of, by and for the people will encourage them to act as blockades against violent reactionary elements. Impeachment could well be the secret weapon in our national defense. Impeachment could be the ultimate bunker buster that will purge the leadership that the world wants to get at, through us. Impeachment could move us from being collateral targets to active citizens.

The well-protected architects of this government’s suicidal policies are indifferent to what makes us safe. Anyone who talks so much about keeping us safe reveals something quite opposite. What are they trying to convince us of? And why do we believe them?

At the protest at inauguration 2001 there were mink coats, Stetson hats and lots of parties with lots of beef – and in the streets a feeling of free fall. It was just gonna happen – all of it – whatever lurked behind the front called GW Bush was going to happen even after we knew the majority didn’t ask for it. The free fall is still going on but instead of waiting for the hard landing – we can take the land and instead of falling on our backs, we can stand. But to do that – impeachment is essential.

billcdavis.com