Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: elmatador who wrote (5971)	5/2/2006 2:40:43 AM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 217773

So, a major part of the elections is set: <That's exactly the message they are sending: Any party that makes us LEGAL will get our votes> The party that supports invaders taking over the country after breaking the law will get the vote of the invaders. The party which opposes invaders being given the keys to the Kingdom will only get the votes of existing Americans. Since the invaders don't yet have a vote, and the invaders don't seem to me to be ideal citizens, I can imagine that most Americans would be quite nervous about them becoming citizens, getting the vote and voting to take over from Americans who used to own the USA. Which means most Americans, I guess, will vote to oppose invaders being given citizenship. King George II has Mexicans in the family and crowding into Jeb's Florida, and he seems to favour the invaders. But King George II isn't the only Republican setting policy. I dare say the Congressional Republicans have a different point of view. Mqurice