SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jttmab who wrote (186009)5/2/2006 10:41:00 AM
From: michael97123  Respond to of 281500
 
When bush had his carrier moment there were only 150 american casualties. When saddam was captured the number was at 500. However easy Darfur may be early on, if bin laden is able to make good his threat to use terror against the UN, Nato and the US forces there, you may very well end up between a cross between somalia and iraq. We werent able to stop the bleeding in iraq so why are some so sure that darfur will be so easy?



To: jttmab who wrote (186009)5/2/2006 7:04:20 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
NATO able to handle Serbia without massive US intervention?

Maybe Sudan is a pushover as many African countries are. Who knows.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News