Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Impeach George W. Bush -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (59832)	5/3/2006 11:59:45 AM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93284

Look, anyone can cry "rape!" 20 years after the fact, or even 20 minutes, and the accused really has no way of defending himself or proving otherwise. Is Broaderrick's only statement UNDER OATH was that Clinton never touched her in her life that's alarmingly suspicious when she suddenly turned around and cries "rape!". 20 years late too. Man, that's ridiculous. When you add to this all the other coordinated phony accusations against the Clintons during this exact same time period, coordinating with the Lewinsky case, including charges of murder, drug-running and stealing the White House silverware, I think we have a very clear case of fraud by the accusers. Plus, remember, even the partisan Starr was unable to find a single case of wrongdoing by the Clintons over their entire lives despite years of investigation and 80 million bucks in expenses. Hillary was right, this was just a big rightwing conspiracy, and they had no business investigating Bill's sex life to begin with. Can you imagine if congress now started investigating Bush's drug use from the 70's? Or his rumored stripper mistress from the 90's? Please. Besides, since when is having consensual sex illegal? See why they invented the "rape" charge? They had to claim something illegal, and murder and drug-running weren't credible enough even for Hannity and Limbaugh.

To: one_less who wrote (59832)	5/3/2006 8:01:55 PM
From: sea_biscuit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93284

Oh, stop it! There are bigger things to worry about - like Dumbya raping the US, nay, the entire world, for one. Btw, want to see oil at $100/barrel and gas at $5-$6 a gallon? Demand that Dumbya bomb Iran! Though it appears that the monster might not need any egging anyway...

To: one_less who wrote (59832)	5/3/2006 10:41:24 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 93284

Clinton did not abuse his power. He was unfairly and unethically targeted for a smear campaign. His sex life should not have been investigated by congress and its highly partisan prosecutor, Ken Starr, who recently was found guilty of commiting fraud and falsifying evidence. Clinton was amazingly cooperative with this stupid partisan investigation. In fact he should have refused to answer their questions. Clinton was far too cooperative and refused to abuse his power and stonewall them the way Bush-Cheney always do. Have you ever seen Bush-Cheney testify under oath? No, they refuse to, even during the all-important 9-11 commission hearings. So we don't know if they were totally lying. So, how about if we have congress investigate the personal life of GW Bush going back to the 70's? Why not? And what will we find? We will find he lied about his Guard service, lied about his arrest record and failed to tell us about various abortions, cocaine binges and mistresses. But you know what, who cares? What matters is how he governs, and Bush is the worst ever, while Clinton was the best president since JFK. His economy alone was a shining example of exactly how it should be done. It was all paid for plus surpluses. And he took out a dangerous dictator with WMD without a single US casualty.