Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Impeach George W. Bush -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Orcastraiter who wrote (60003)	5/4/2006 4:35:03 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93284

Obviously you have chosen to continue to evade and avoid substantiating your allegations. That casts you into the category of discredited fraud. Sorry to see you make such a choice. Best regards, Gem

To: Orcastraiter who wrote (60003)	5/4/2006 4:51:32 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 93284

"Wrong. Here is your statement: "...you're the liar, and everyone here knows it." I responded because the statement is inclusive of me and it does not ring true. I am someone who is here and I do not know this to be an accurate characterisation. I said that I have read many of his posts and have not found him to be a liar. I asked you to provide a link that proves him to be a liar and to substantiate your proof of the action that makes him a liar. I clarified that request with a reminder of what qualifies an utterance or action as a lie. "the intent to deceive." Your only response thus far is to insinuate that the many posts available on this thread confirm your allegation that this behavior is pervasive. I have already stated that I found no evidence of a lie in those posts. It is quite an easy thing for you to provide an exemplary sample and to substantiate it with proof of the lie. You have deliberately avoided that easy tasks, exposing your self to the natural critique that follows. Simple logic. You allege something. I ask you for evidence. You declare the evidence to be ubiquitous. I admit that I am not seeing it and ask for a sample of that which you proclaim to be easily available. More evasion... you haven't come clean, because you apparently are not. tsk best regards, Gem

To: Orcastraiter who wrote (60003)	5/4/2006 4:56:18 PM
From: longnshort	Respond to of 93284

what did Marx say, 'first you break up the family" States Capitol Resource Institute on its website: "The reason this is such an outrageous bill is because it is the most extreme effort thus far to transform our public schools into institutions that disregard all notions of the traditional family unit. SB 1437 seeks to eliminate all 'stereotypes' of the traditional family so that young children are brainwashed into believing that families with moms and dads are irrelevant