SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (287309)5/9/2006 4:42:51 PM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574786
 
"So it's either-or? No alternatives like the power of individuals and grass roots?"

Great in theory, not so great in practice. If you are surrounded by a small number of people you can get to know intimately, there isn't a real need for government. As the density increases, the need goes up. Look at what happened in the West during the 1800s. People were spread pretty thinly and there wasn't any government to speak of. In the wake of the Civil War and the railroads, more and more people moved west and the Wild West was born. Now true, a certain amount of what we "know" about that period is heavily influenced by Hollywood. But the need for a sheriff and a judicial system was very real.



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (287309)5/9/2006 5:04:50 PM
From: TigerPaw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574786
 
No alternatives like the power of individuals and grass roots?


That is a recipe for anarchy, and eventually becomes a winner-take-all dictatorship. Checks and balances are the answer. That means you actually have to have a government, and it has to be mired in slow action. It may be a bit frustrating, but it's the closest thing to freedom you find on a crowded planet.

TP