SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: PartyTime who wrote (65010)5/10/2006 4:18:46 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 173976
 
Oooops...Maybe Bush should get a couple of slick attorneys on his staff, like these two who know how to get out of trouble:

Why The Clintons Belong in Prison

By Jamie Glazov
FrontPageMagazine.com | April 5, 2006

Frontpage Interview’s guest today is Melrose Larry Green, the author of the book Why The Clintons Belong in Prison. He is a frequent contributor to Newsmax.com and has been a regular guest on the Howard Stern Show. He is a graduate of Brandeis (B.A.) and Cornell (M.B. A.) universities. His website is www.melroselarry.com and he can be contacted at melrose1@earthlink.net.

FP: Melrose Larry Green, welcome to Frontpage Interview

Green: Thank you. I am taking a break from reading David Horowitz's book "The Professors" to chat with you. David is one of my heroes. Let's get into "Why the Clintons Belong in Prison."

FP: Ok, well it’s good to see you are reading the right books. So what made you write your book?

Green: I was on a trip to New York City about 8 years ago, when a friend handed me some articles about the death of Ron Brown. The author was a fellow named Christopher Ruddy, whom we all know from Newsmax.com. Well, one thing led to another, and I became obsessed with the many crimes committed by the Clintons. But the greatest crime of all is that they are not now behind bars. Mind you, I am a former Democrat, and I admit that I voted for Bill Clinton in 1992. I wrote the book because there is a myth that Bill Clinton was a great President, and I must set the record straight. Furthermore, Hillary Clinton is right now on a direct path to the White House, and I want to do my part to keep her out of the White House in 2008.

FP: Why did you vote for Clinton in 1992? Please explain the mindset as this is very mysterious and foreign territory for me.

Green: I voted for Clinton in 1992 because I didn't know any better. I had never heard of Bill Clinton before, and he sure looked and sounded great. Little did I know about his scandal-filled years as Governor of Arkansas.

FP: You talk about a "gentleman's agreement" that was made between Bush and the Democrats when the President entered office. Can you comment on this?

Green: This story has been running around Washington D.C. for years. The gist of it is the following: in January 2001, top Senate and House Democrats allegedly told President Bush that if he sought an indictment of Bill and Hillary Clinton, the Democrats would vote for none of Bush's legislative agenda. Of course this story is purely hearsay, but it makes perfect sense to me. As an investigative reporter, I am obliged not to divulge the names of the reporters who told me this story. Suffice it to say that they are household names and highly credible sources.

FP: What exactly was the Chinagate scandal?

Green: Chinagate was one of the most serious scandals of the Clinton Administration. It involved treason, in my opinion, on the part of Bill Clinton. Clinton sold military secrets and technology to the Chinese, in exchange for political contributions from the Chinese to his campaign. There were so many other scandals associated with the Clintons, that Chinagate received very little coverage from the "mainstream" media. My book "Why the Clintons Belong in Prison" goes into great detail to explain Chinagate.

FP: Clinton sold military secrets and technology to the Chinese communists and nothing has been done about it? Why?

Green: Good question. I have very little faith in the prosecutorial abilities of the Dept. of Justice under the present or former Attorneys General. They should have done their homework and done some of the research that Chris Ruddy of Newsmax has done. Check out his book "Bitter Legacy".

FP: You state that Hillary is probably the "dirtiest person" in the history of American politics. Why do you say this?

Green: Hillary is all about herself and the acquisition of power by destroying anyone who gets in her way. To say that she has ice in her veins is an understatement. There are countless incidents in my book which document her contemptuous attitude toward the Secret Service, the military, and the Arkansas State Police. She would often use the vilest form of profanity while addressing her co-workers. And Hillary loves to use dirty tricks in politics. She makes the Nixon Watergate team look like choirboys. Hillary is more of a man than Bill ever was.

FP: When you say that Hillary is all about the acquisition of power, then can we presume that that is what her marriage to Clinton is all about? Is that why she never really cared about all his affairs? In other words, she was only concerned if he got caught but didn’t really care about the matters of the heart?

Green: The Clinton marriage was just a business deal. I believe that Hillary has had her eyes set on the White House ever since Bill first became Governor of Arkansas- back in 1978.

It is common knowledge that Hillary is bi-sexual. According to Bill's long-time ex-girlfriend Gennifer Flowers, Hillary enjoyed performing oral sex on other women. On p.41 of Flowers' autobiography "Passion and Betrayal", Gennifer asked Bill if there was any truth to the rumor that Hillary was having an affair with another woman. Bill laughed and said (referring to Hillary): "Honey - she's probably eaten more p---y than I have."

What upset Hillary is not that Bill messed around. What upset her is that he got caught so many times.

FP: Tell us about Hillary's anti-Semitic slurs.

Green: Several books have documented that when Bill lost an election back in Arkansas, Hillary lashed out at one of the campaign managers by calling him "a f--kin Jew bastard." Hillary would often lace consultant Dick Morris with anti-Semitic barbs. It has been reported in several books that when Bill and Hillary would argue, they would insult the other by calling one another anti-Semitic epithets.

FP: Please enlighten me here about these anti-Semitic slurs on the part of the Clintons. Why would they use them? What was the background and the belief system?

Green: According to Jerry Oppenheimer in "State of a Union”, Hillary's grandmother, Hannah Rodham had a "violent antipathy to both Catholics and Jews." (p.155.) Hillary's maternal grandmother had gotten re-married to a Jew by the name of Max Rosenberg. Hillary's mother Dorothy (Max's step-daughter) was a vicious anti-Semite. According to Hillary's cousin Oscar Dowdy, Hillary's mother would say: "Oh, all those damn Jews are so cheap" and "That Jew has to watch every dime, that kind of thing." Hillary's grandmother Della even referred to her husband Max as "a cheap Jew bastard."

FP: In your book you discuss Bill and Hillary's criminal use of the IRS and how absolutely no one has ever done anything about it. Can you comment on this for us?

Green: Many of Bill's girlfriends were audited by the IRS. Practically every conservative organization that had an unkind word to say about the Clintons was audited by the IRS. For several years during Clinton's presidency, the IRS Commissioner was their buddy from their days at Yale, Margaret Milner Richardson. Bill Clinton's use of the IRS against his political enemies is so blatantly criminal, that even a grade-school student could pick it out. Why the Clinton impeachment staff didn't go after Clinton for use of the IRS against his enemies is something I wonder about to this day.

FP: Illuminate for us what the Clinton goon squad was (and is).

Green: Bill Clinton's goon squad consisted of a team of private investigators who systematically intimidated, harassed, and tried to discredit many of the women who alleged to have had sexual relationships (both wanted and unwanted) with Bill Clinton. Anthony Pellicano and Jack Palladino are two of the most prominent members of the Clinton goon squad. But there were many other people who helped out to give the First Pervert a free pass to stay in power for eight years.

FP: What are the top crimes perpetrated by the Clintons for which they deserve to be in prison? Why are they not in prison?

Green: I feel that Bill Clinton committed treason when he sold American military secrets to the Red Chinese government. I think that Bill Clinton is guilty of rape (of Juanita Broaddrick). I think that there are numerous examples of bribery committed by Bill and Hillary Clinton during the final round of Presidential pardons (especially the case of Marc Rich and his ex-wife Denise Rich.) Let's not forget the dozens of unexplained deaths surrounding Bill and Hillary Clinton - Ron Brown, Vince Foster, Mary Mahoney – for which there have been no proper investigations.

I can go on and on about crimes committed by the Clintons, but you should just read my book. The Clintons are not in prison because they are clever lawyers who amassed a team of lawyers, public relations spinners, and media consultants to con the American people. The very fact that Ken Starr was vilified by the Clintonistas for simply doing his job, while Bill Clinton turned the White House into his personal house of sexual infidelity says it all.

FP: How do you think the Clintons hurt this country? Did they jeopardize our national security? For instance, did they leave us vulnerable to 9/11?

Green: I think the Clintons have terribly hurt this country, by eliminating basic standards of morality to millions of American youth, and by leaving America vulnerable to the Al Qaeda and the attacks of 9-11. The Clintons despised the military and the police. Under Bill Clinton, terrorism was treated as a criminal matter, just like the pursuit of a bank robber. Clinton cared more about the civil rights of terrorists than the security of the American people. The Clinton

Administration was soft on terrorism - under Clinton's watch the World Trade Center was hit the first time (in 1993), the Khobar Towers, the U.S.S. Cole was bombed, 2 embassies in Africa were bombed - and Bill Clinton did virtually nothing. Furthermore, Bill Clinton had several opportunities to take out Osama Bin Laden, and he blew it. See Richard Miniter's book "Losing Bin Laden" for all the details.

FP: What if Hillary Clinton became President? Is it a nightmare scenario?

Green: It would definitely be a disaster if Hillary Clinton became President. To borrow from the playbook of Alec Baldwin, I will move out of the country- probably to Israel.

FP: Melrose Larry Green, thank you for joining us today.

Green: Thank you Jamie.



To: PartyTime who wrote (65010)5/10/2006 5:16:41 PM
From: Crimson Ghost  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 173976
 
America's new "silent majority"
And so tonight-to you, the great silent majority of my fellow Americans-I ask for your support.
-- Richard Nixon, Nov. 3, 1969.

Will Bunch

We were reading the New York Times on Sunday, which had an interesting article about the political situation in Ohio, where the Democrats have a good chance of wresting control of the statehouse and a Senate and several House seats. But this passage leaped off the page at us:

Mr. Brown is considered one of the more liberal members of the state's Congressional delegation; he supports abortion rights, opposed the constitutional amendment prohibiting same-sex marriage and voted against the war in Iraq.

"Sherrod Brown is out of the mainstream," Mrs. Dole said. "I don't think his kind of liberalism will sell across the state. Drawing the contrast is the key here: it's the choice between the two candidates, despite the environment."

Incredibly, that exchange just stood there, unchallenged. So just how far out of the mainstream is Sherrod Brown?

-- A new poll just out shows that a majority of Americans -- some 57 percent -- now believe that sending troops to Iraq was a mistake, in essence agreeing that Brown's opposition to the war was correct.

-- On an amendment to ban gay marriage, a poll released just this week found that voters rank this at the very bottom of issues that they want Congress to take up, and some 63 percent of Americans are either strongly or somewhat concerned about changing the Constitution over this issue.

-- On abortion rights, the nation is fairly evenly divided. A poll taken in April shows 51 percent opposed to most abortion rights and 46 percent generally in favor -- but a majority opposed a law in South Dakota seeking to ban them.

Based on that, Sherrod Brown may be the most mainstream candidate in America. However, you could almost forgive someone for thinking the opposite, given the media's failings to provide any context. The Democrat's positions are very much in the majority -- a new kind of "silent majority" that leans to center-left as opposed to Nixon's center-right grouping.

They are not the people posting multiple diaries on blogs like Daily Kos, or obsessing over the latest doings inside the Beltway -- as you probably do if you're reading this. They're too busy making a modest living.

They are, instead, the people that we see so often when TV or radio tries some rare "man on the street" reporting -- bashing the war in Iraq or asking the government to stay out of their bedroom, and occasionally getting funny looks from reporters who fail to realize just how "mainstream" these points of view actually are.

They are cab drivers and nurses, waitresses and insurance agents. They don't read blogs but most of them vote -- and so it's why the Democrats got the most ballots for president in 1992, 1996, and 2000, and came within an eyelash of ousting "a war president" in 2004.

The things that this "silent majority" believes may not boil down easily to a single word or a short soundbite, but they are common sense ideals, and truly American. And so they believe in family values and probably in a God as well, but not in the government intruding on their private lives, let along reading their emails. They believe in a strong defense, but not in wars that America starts first. They believe in free-market capitalism, as long as rich people pay their fair share and the environment is protected.

True, in many ways they are a different "silent majority" from the one that elected Richard Nixon in 1968. Times have changed. America is both more diverse and -- Lou Dobbs and his noisy minority of fanatics notwithstanding -- tolerates more diversity.

And so they are all around you, and yet this "silent majority" is able to hide in plain sight, not just from the news media but even from the leaders of the Democratic Party, the partisans who would seem best positioned to represent them in D.C.

And so we watch a Democratic Party that is splitting itself in two, arguing what's the real message and what's the best way to woo over a mass of people who might very well tell you -- if you would just listen -- that "you had me at 'hello.'" And we guess there will always be debates over strategy and tactics -- that's why consultants and even a few bloggers get paid the big bucks.

But at the end of the day, should it really be hard for a Democrat like Sherrod Brown to win in 2006?

Everyone should just stop yelling for a moment...and listen to your silent majority.

Posted on May 10, 2006 10:56 AM