Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (18248)	5/10/2006 4:24:54 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 543068

Posted on PFP. No wringing of hands over the word "incident". Gee, you found an example that didn't get a reaction. That surely proves that I imagined the whole thing...

To: epicure who wrote (18248)	5/10/2006 5:07:51 PM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 543068

I was wondering what everybody was talking about -- it's the letter from Ahmadinejad -- why not discuss the substance? I thought he raised some excellent points, but others I dispute. For example, the point about the US supporting Iraq against Iran in their terrible war against each other. He forgets we sold weapons to both sides. I don't have a timeline of that terrible war, perhaps someone else does, but my understanding (maybe "impression" is more precise) is that we did so simultaneously. There's no doubt that we assisted Saddam early on, but stopped once it became known that he was using poison gas against the Kurds, which became a scandal. There's no doubt we sold weapons to Iran secretly and used that money to support the Contras against the Sandinistas in Nicaragua. War is a terrible thing but as a practical matter, it may be better than the alternatives. Not sure how we could justify helping both sides in the Iran-Iraq war, though.