Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ChinuSFO who wrote (18271)	5/10/2006 7:25:46 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 543310

An interesting article, but I'm not so sure I agree with its conclusion.

To: ChinuSFO who wrote (18271)	5/10/2006 7:29:36 PM
From: thames_sider	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 543310

Fascinating (and thoroughly neutral-seeming) analysis. I have a couple of quibbles - they seem to exclude any other actors, such as maybe Turkey, and other Sunni states; and also (in their Shia section) do not seem to recognise the apparent distinctions between the local militia in ethnically mixed areas like Baghdad, as distinct from the more uniform southern (?more Iran-influenced?) Shia. And also, they seem to discount the apparent determintion of the US to leave permanent bases on Iraqi soil, replacing the Arabian ones - unless these are now being disassembled, but last I read there was a lot of effort and resource going to reinforce these, so they didn't look like temporary structures. But nice find, still.