Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: loantech who wrote (11061)	5/11/2006 9:56:04 AM
From: Mr. Aloha	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 78419

I was hoping for a pullback/rest after the recent rally, but now it looks like we may not get one. If MMGG starts being thought of as a silver stock in addition to a zinc stock, watch out...

To: loantech who wrote (11061)	5/11/2006 10:39:28 AM
From: Mr. Aloha	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78419

On initial read, some may have seen the results as disappointing, as there's a mistake in the news release. The top portion of the release is a summary, and shows columns for Silver g/tonne and oz/tonne. The lower portion breaks out into more detail, and shows Silver g/tonne and Silver g/tonne. The second column should be oz/tonne, as you can tell by looking at the averages and comparing to the summary up top. I've called the company to alert them of the error. I think people are starting to notice that it's a mistake, and seeing that these are great results. Look at how high grade some of those veins are. MMGG should now be considered a silver company as well as a zinc company, and is still severely undervalued, IMO.