Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Crazy Fools LightHouse -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ms.smartest.person who wrote (1075)	5/11/2006 6:13:56 PM
From: ms.smartest.person	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3198

Bolivia Steps on the Gas Daphne EviatarThu May 11, 12:36 PM ET The Nation -- Bolivia's natural gas reserves are estimated to be worth about $100 billion. Still, the nation remains the poorest in South America. Evo Morales, the country's first indigenous president, was elected with record-high support in December precisely because he promised to nationalize Bolivia's natural resources. Ordinarily that means expropriating private property. But in this case, despite the alarms rung by the US press, Morales is demanding something far less radical: He wants oil companies to renegotiate their contracts so Bolivians get a larger share of the profits. No candidate could have won the election without promising some form of nationalization. Popular protests have led to the ouster of two presidents in the past three years because Bolivia's natural gas industry wasn't doing nearly as much for the country as for the foreign oil companies controlling it. When I traveled to Bolivia this past winter, even energy-industry insiders who'd helped draft the country's privatization plan a decade ago agreed that the deals struck between the oil companies and the government--giving Bolivia only 18 percent of oil and gas profits--were now untenable. "When the law was written, the price of oil was around $15 a barrel," said Mauricio Gonzalez, president of the national oil company and energy minister under President Gonzalo Sanchez de Lozada, who in the 1990s oversaw the industry's privatization. "They focused on generating growth and forgot about redistribution." Under that 1996 law, urged by the World Bank and IMF, Bolivia sold the bulk of its oil and gas industry to private companies and put production, sales and pricing in their hands. Since then Bolivia's estimated natural gas reserves have certainly grown: Analysts believe the country has ten times as much gas as it once thought--54 trillion cubic feet. World Bank officials now admit the low royalty and tax rates have been a bad deal for Bolivia. Morales was elected in the wake of Bolivians' mounting protests. "Gas is Bolivian!" demonstrators shouted as they massed outside the presidential palace before the ouster of President Carlos Mesa a year ago. "We want to nationalize, to participate in the production train," Oscar Olivera, a leading Bolivian activist, told me when I visited him in Cochabamba. "It's the only way to recuperate the gas for us." So on May 1 Morales announced that the state was retaking Bolivia's gas fields. To underscore his point, he sent troops to guard them, and he immediately hiked taxes on the two biggest fields. "The looting by foreign companies has ended," Morales declared. Companies must sell 51 percent of their holdings to the Bolivian government and renegotiate their contracts within six months. Morales's move was surely inspired by Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez, who in March announced that he was converting thirty-two private oilfields into joint ventures with the Venezuelan government and doubling the country's take per barrel. But Morales doesn't have the power of Chávez: Bolivia's gas reserves aren't nearly as valuable as Venezuela's oil. How far he'll be able to take his plan remains to be seen. "As always with the complicated gas issue, the devil remains in the details," says Jim Shultz, executive director of the Democracy Center, a Cochabamba-based advocacy group. It's not yet clear whether Morales's move is merely the first step in a restructuring of Bolivia's gas industry or nationalist bluster that won't stand up to hard negotiations with the oil companies. To some extent that will depend on how valuable the companies believe Bolivia's gas really is. If they can still make a profit, they'll stay and negotiate. If it's not worth the cost, they'll leave--and will certainly sue the government in international arbitration for millions in damages. As negotiations proceed over the next six months, the companies will be using the threat of arbitration as a sword of Damocles hanging over the country. They'll also emphasize that if they leave, Bolivia will have neither the cash nor the expertise to exploit its resources fully. If Morales stands up to them, it may be because he's counting on the continued support of Chávez, his compañero and benefactor. The Venezuelan president has increased aid to Bolivia as he moves to consolidate his power in South America and encourage opposition to the United States and its trade agreements. Indeed, just before his May 1 announcement, Morales joined Chávez and Cuban leader Fidel Castro in the Bolivarian Alternative for the Americas, a regional challenge to the US-supported Free Trade Area of the Americas; it would eliminate most tariffs between members, promote investment and advance technical and educational cooperation. Already, Cuba has sent nurses and teachers to Venezuela and Bolivia, and Venezuela is providing its partners oil at reduced prices. The US reaction to Morales's latest move has been decidedly muted--a sign that Washington knows its stock in the region is low and is treading lightly to avoid provoking further hostility. Will Morales's moves further drive up the price of natural gas on the world market? Maybe. But it's senseless to blame leaders like Hugo Chávez and Evo Morales for turning the high price of oil to the benefit of their own people. Ultimately, it's the shortsightedness of the multilateral banks and private oil companies that's produced growing discontent across Latin America. The region's democratically elected leaders now have little choice but to respond. Like this article? Try 4 issues of The Nation at home (and online) FREE. Copyright © 2006 The Nation news.yahoo.com

To: ms.smartest.person who wrote (1075)	5/14/2006 11:59:00 PM
From: ms.smartest.person	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3198

&#8362 David Pescod's Late Edition May 12, 2006 INTL FRONTIER RESOURCES (V-IFR) $2.34 +0.03 Maybe we are getting closer to the time when we will find out what it was that little International Frontier and partners Husky, North Rock, EOG and others drilled this past winter up in the Canadian Arctic. Results of the latest land sale for over 500,000 hectares is now public and it looks like the consortium got the one block they were after which is adjacent to EL-397 which involves a $10 million plus work commitment for 85,000 hectares. What President Pat Bowsell found of interest was the increasing interest in the Arctic, as Devon and Talisman got together and bid for 4 of the 6 parcels. Also one of the remanding parcels went to Paramount. As far as news on what they have found, he suggests that it involves drafting news releases and of course having American partners, delays things just a tad also. As to what’s happening on a handful of North Sea ventures, he would only say that they are working on it. Needless to say, what happens next on the North Sea, particularly the Quad 14 project, will be increasingly important to International Frontier. S&P/TSX Venture Composite Index GOLDCORP (T-G) $41.74 -1.82 GOLD $714.80 -1.80 S&P/TSX VENTURE INDEX $12046.42 -119.01 To the left we have some charts - the six month gold chart shows you the incredible move we’ve seen in the last month and a half, as gold as surged from $550 to more than $700. All that without any correction at all—it’s been unbelievable. Are we due for a correction? Well, the market today is having at least a burp or maybe more….. When we ask a typical mining guy like Don Moore, though, he still doesn’t appear too worried. He is firmly convinced that while some of the big gold stocks definitely have had a run, many of the juniors didn’t participate that much. “We still haven't seen the buying frenzy you might worry about near a top”, he suggests. Well, we don’t know but we remember the old saying, “Sell in May and go away” and that certainly has been a long move up in gold without a correction, but then today has definitely been an “oowie. LEADER ENERGY (V-LEE) $4.75 n/c Leader Energy was one of the success stories through much of last year in the oil and gas service business as experienced management took over a new start up firm. However, delays in receiving equipment meant that a recent quarterly financial was not up to some analyst’s expectations and we saw back on March/April quite a correction. Now all of a sudden, we are seeing things going the right way and we go to the guy that does the IR for Leader – Jason Krueger to give us a quick explanation. Jason suggests that “management is now on an IR tour to places like Houston, New York, Toronto and the like to tell their story again and hence the new market awareness.” Of more fundamental importance is their move into the cementing business is going almost ahead of schedule compared to previous problems receiving equipment. They expect to have four units out and operational by the end of June and eight more by the end of the third quarter. They hope to have a total of 18 by year end. “All of their operators have ten years experience and given the current boom in the oil and gas business” he suggests. This should bode well for this junior service company. Yes, we own a bunch! If you would like to receive the Late Edition, just e-mail Debbie at debbie_lewis@canaccord.com