Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The Barrett Bucket -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (799)	5/11/2006 6:41:15 PM
From: longnshort	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1233

exactly, when cornered a lib will try to use the number of ignores you have as proof that you are wrong

To: Brumar89 who wrote (799)	5/14/2006 12:23:17 PM
From: Sully-	Respond to of 1233

Yup, eleutheria also uses it as a club to beat you over the head with when her POV cannot stand up to reality based debate. I don't know if it's organized by them or not. As we already know, most leftists here cling to some of the most outrageous yet provably false tin foil hat memes. Heck, one can still find MSM editorials that asserts Bush stole the 2000 election &/or every other thoroughly discredited lie since then. Think about how the ban lists on leftist threads on SI provide overwhelming evidence of leftist intolerance for reality based debate that runs contrary to their groupthink alternate reality. Many leftists brag about the liberal use of the ignore feature. And as has been discussed here, look at how many completely off the charts moonbats have a relatively high number of member bookmarks. Heck, now we even have a sham centrist thread where die hard leftists pretend they are genuinely mainstream "centrists". It would make sense that as a knee kerk reaction to anything that runs contrary to their obvious sham beliefs, they would "feel" it is necessary to be shut all of it out completely in order to continue clinging to them.