SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Israel to U.S. : Now Deal with Syria and Iran -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: sea_urchin who wrote (10909)5/12/2006 8:30:08 AM
From: Crimson Ghost  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 22250
 
Faith's Pearl Harbor

"Days after 9/11, a senior Pentagon official lamented the lack of good targets in Afghanistan and proposed instead U.S. military attacks in South America or Southeast Asia as 'a surprise to the terrorists,’ according to a footnote in the recent 9/11 Commission Report. The unsigned top-secret memo, which the panel's report said appears to have been written by Defense Under Secretary Douglas Feith, is one of several Pentagon documents uncovered by the commission which advance unorthodox ideas for the war on terror. The memo suggested 'hitting targets outside the Middle East in the initial offensive’ or a 'non-Al Qaeda target like Iraq,’ the panel's report states. U.S. attacks in Latin America and Southeast Asia were portrayed as a way to catch the terrorists off guard when they were expecting an assault on Afghanistan."

The content for the memo came from usual suspects Michael Maloof and David Wurmser:

"They argued that an attack on terrorists in South America – for example, a remote region on the border of Paraguay, Argentina and Brazil where intelligence reports said Iranian-backed Hizbullah had a presence – would have ripple effects on other terrorist operations."

The report goes on to note that Wolfowitz wrote a September 17, 2001 memo advocating an attack on Iraq, based on the theories of nutjob Laurie Mylroie.

Conspiracy theorists have noted that the events of September 11 look suspiciously like the desired event in the PNAC document "Rebuilding America’s Defenses":

". . . the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor."

The Feith/Maloof/Wurmser/Wolfowitz (quite a group right there, but don’t forget, there is no Lobby, and it has no power!) cynicism is so extreme that they are ready to use September 11 as their Pearl Harbor for attacks wherever and whenever it is most convenient (note that even early on the liars didn’t believe their own lies, describing Iraq as a "non-Al Qaeda target"). It didn’t matter to them whether there was even the slightest reason to believe that the area under attack had anything to do with the attacks on the United States. Afghanistan’s lack of good targets reminds me of the joke of the drunk searching for his lost wallet under the street lamp, not because he lost it there, but because the light was better.

Xymphora



To: sea_urchin who wrote (10909)5/12/2006 7:42:50 PM
From: sea_urchin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 22250
 
> the "chow" wasn't very well behaved.

In fact, there's no evidence that the "chow" even wags its tail at the US -- rather, some people hear it growling.

sandersresearch.com

>>Clearly, the American public understands that the American government of our day is not representing the commons, but rather the particular interests of factions of capital. By contrast, the Russian government enjoys a strong approval rating as it is, correctly we think, perceived by the Russian public to be pursuing Russian interests unlike its predecessor, which was, also correctly we think, perceived as serving Western financial interests.

There may be a world war coming alright, but if there is, the real opposition will not be Islamic fundamentalism, Latin American nationalists or avian influenza, rather it is the realists in Moscow who enjoy at least two clear advantages over their Anglo-American opposite numbers.

They have public support, and being realists, not ideologues, clear judgment.<<



To: sea_urchin who wrote (10909)5/13/2006 4:32:14 AM
From: GUSTAVE JAEGER  Respond to of 22250
 
Re: But the point of the argument is that, if Russia was America's "chow", as you say, it (Russia) would have allowed Rothschild, and whoever else, to take over Russian assets.

TNK-BP

History


On September 1, 2003, BP, one of the largest international oil companies, and Alfa Access Renova (AAR) announced the creation of a strategic partnership to jointly hold their oil assets in Russia and Ukraine. As a result, TNK-BP was created. Today, TNK-BP is Russia’s third largest oil company in terms of reserves and crude oil production.
[...]

tnk-bp.com

Our company

TNK-BP is a major Russian vertically integrated oil company, established in September 2003 as a result of the merger of Russian companies TNK (Tyumen Oil Co.) and SIDANCO with the majority of BP’s Russian oil assets.

The company is 50% owned by BP and 50% by a group of prominent Russian investors: Alfa Group, Access Industries and Renova (AAR). The shareholders of TNK-BP also own close to 50% of Slavneft. This interest will eventually be integrated into TNK-BP.

TNK-BP is headquartered in Moscow and is governed by a multinational management team, which consists of Russian and international executives who have worked in more than 50 countries worldwide. The team combines the best of Russian and international talent and experience and includes executives from BP, TNK, Sidanco and other international companies.

Today, TNK-BP is Russia’s second largest oil company. The company employs close to 100,000 people and operates in nearly all of Russia’s major hydrocarbon regions, including:

* West Siberia (in the Tyumen, Khanty-Mansiysk, Yamal-Nenetsk and Novosibirsk Regions);
* the Volga-Urals (in the Orenburg and Saratov Regions and the Republic of Udmurtia);
* East Siberia (in the Irkutsk Region); and
* the Far East (Sakhalin).

In 2004, average crude oil production totaled 1.44 million barrels per day (bpd), or 72 million tons per year. Current oil production is roughly 1.5 million bpd.

TNK-BP operates five refineries in Russia and Ukraine, and markets products through over 2,000 retail service stations operating under TNK and BP brands. Through its retail network, TNK-BP is among the market leaders in petroleum product sales in European Russia, including Moscow, and is the market leader in Ukraine.
[...]

tnk-bp.com

Profile of BP CEO:

John Browne, Baron Browne of Madingley
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

For other notable people called John Browne, see John Browne (disambiguation).

The Right Honourable Edmund John Philip Browne, Baron Browne of Madingley (b. February 20, 1948) is group Chief Executive of [British Petroleum]. He was born in Hamburg in Germany to a British Army officer and a Hungarian Auschwitz survivor. His father also worked in civilian life for Anglo-Persian Oil, which was later rebranded as British Petroleum and then as BP. He was educated at Kings School, Ely, St John's College, Cambridge, where he earned a First Class Bachelor's degree in Physics; he later obtained an MS from Stanford Business School. In May 2003, he was awarded an honorary Doctor of Engineering degree from the Colorado School of Mines.

At the suggestion of his father, Browne joined BP as an apprentice in 1966 while still at university. He has served as group chief executive since 1995. He is a non-executive director of the Intel Corporation and Goldman Sachs, a trustee of the British Museum, a member of the Governing Body of the London Business School and a member of the Supervisory Board of DaimlerChrysler AG. He is also emeritus chairman of the Advisory Board of the Stanford Graduate School of Business and the Judge Business School, Cambridge as well as a trustee of the Conference Board, Inc. and a vice president and member of the board of the Prince of Wales Business Leaders Forum.

In 1998, he was knighted by Queen Elizabeth II and in 2001 named as one of the "people's peers" taking the title Baron Browne of Madingley, of Cambridge in the County of Cambridgeshire, and becoming a crossbencher (independent member) in the House of Lords.
[...]

en.wikipedia.org

nndb.com