SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mas_ who wrote (196639)5/13/2006 4:16:04 PM
From: eracerRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Re: We are still unsure whether the 2MB Conroes will be single or dual core.

Has there been any indication anywhere they would be single core? I'm sure Charlie @ The Inquirer and many other sources would have made everyone aware of that fact if it were true. The 2MB Conroes have the same naming scheme (E6xxx) as the 4MB versions which would indicate they have the same number of cores. Intel uses T2xxx for Core Duo and T1xxx for Core Solo.



To: mas_ who wrote (196639)5/13/2006 4:52:39 PM
From: dougSF30Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
EDIT: saw your reg posts. Anything recent making that claim? Seems highly unlikely. No "Core2 Solo" brand has yet been announced by Intel.



To: mas_ who wrote (196639)5/13/2006 4:54:52 PM
From: dougSF30Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
If 65nm starts shipping in H206 (probably Q4), it will take 6-9 months before 65nm speeds exceed current 90nm speeds, if history is any guide. And by that time, the K8L should be launching.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News