SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LLCF who wrote (23552)5/14/2006 12:25:26 PM
From: Solon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 28931
 
"All I ever said was that that is what is being looked for"

No. You threw out the search for a TOE as if it was a mission accomplished and you then argued that Newtonian Physics WOULD be encompassed. At no time did you indicate the conditionality. You were just running off your mouth.

"you just negated dozens of your own posts asserting I didn't know what I was talking about"

Again, you are running off at the mouth. Never did you say: "It will if it exists and if it is discovered". I said THAT! You said: "the new physics will encompass Newtonian physics."

Newton's Laws are universal. Quantum physics remains (at this point and perhaps forever) a separate and distinct branch--a different lens for minding subatomic matter, if you will.

"It was relevant to the above which you've now backed off of...."

You are either incredibly stupid or you believe that everyone else is.

"Yea, and you included all the stuff you used to call "pseudoscience"..."

Don't be a fool. I did no such thing. I copied and referenced links to hundreds of papers categorized as "scientific". I did not claim to read and grade all of those papers to evaluate how each independently measured up to the standards of pure science. You are being idiotic. Grow up.

"so you're saying that a "unified theory" will be a ""COMPLETE paradigm shift."

No. What I said and what you partly quoted was:

"It is an opinion shared by all scientists. That is why they continue to look for a TOE, but nobody has any evidence that a TOE has any scientific validity"

You are either incredibly stupid or you believe that everyone else is.

"so you assertion no scientist would look at QM seem silly"

You are either incredibly stupid or you believe that everyone else is.