Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: eracer who wrote (196724)	5/14/2006 1:09:00 PM
From: AK2004	Respond to of 275872

the point I was making is that there are a lot of assumptions there. re: [sarcasm]I assumed you and others here are familiar with the concept of overclocking....[sarcasm] don't extend your sarcasm to others. :-)) I am far less familiar with the concept than the average poster in this neighborhood :-)) re: so the actual clock-for-clock performance difference would be even higher [sarcasm]really? I would not have guessed[/sarcasm] Of course, the point was that clock for clock comparison is somewhat limited .... P4 would really suck in clock-for-clock comparison..... re: Of course we all know that frequency <> performance. eh? I thought that is the reason for relative performance benchmarks to begin with..... re: Or is a 0-5% performance increase more realistic? am2 would have only marginal performance benefits if any but 1% here 1% there may reduce [sarcasm]performance advantage of non-existing cpu over current amd and intel offerings[/sarcasm] :-)) re: Not many assumptions here on the contrary, it is still all assumptions at this point. Conroe 2 duo is not yet released.....