Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LLCF who wrote (23595)	5/15/2006 10:49:55 AM
From: Solon	Respond to of 28931

"Yea, but it's not... as QM shows." It explains it at the level excluded by QM as has been said all along. "To know the mind of Jesus while claiming at the same time he didn't exist." I don't believe the biblical Jesus existed. When I examine the Jesus figure I do so mostly through the claims of the New Testament. "Claiming to know what the supposed non existant Jesus believed with respect to the OT. According to the New Testament, Jesus believed (like all other believing Jews of the period) in the Divine Authority and literal truth of the Hebrew Scriptures. "Claiming Newtonian physics to be still be universal while at the same time claiming to know all about QM and the new physics." LOL! Once again--Newtonian laws are NOT a TOE! They are not pretended to address the realm of QM--as has been said all along. "Looking for a poster on his thread to show him evidence of god and gods attributes ON LINE!" WRONG! I asked you to justify your ridiculous claims or to qualify them! If you wish to claim Jesus existed (exists) then tell us the basis for making such a claim. Simple, my dear boy! "I'm on vacation starting tomorrow!" Be sure to take along something to read...