Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (6415)	5/14/2006 11:05:48 PM
From: regli	Respond to of 217705

I consider this index incredibly useful: Dabchick's Gold Index sharelynx.com

To: TobagoJack who wrote (6415)	5/15/2006 2:19:49 AM
From: Maurice Winn	Respond to of 217705

Oh, okay. So, if I had allocated more to QCOM, then it would have far exceeded gold. There was also a dividend which wasn't from Go-d [just in case you misunderstand where the dividend came from, and because I quite like the game the Jews play of not writing words out in full if they have G, o and d in them]. The dividend which came from our original investment in the nameless company is running at nearly 50c a share. Which is quite a good return on the original purchase price of about $18 per share/32 [splits] = 56c, especially when there has been a capital gain to go along with the dividends. I think 100% return on investment by dividends is quite good in anybody's book. I hope the words dividend and QCOM are okay in the same paragraph, or at least post, and I note you used them in the same sentence, so it must be okay in the sense of where they can appear in the same sentence together. Mqurice