SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: eracer who wrote (196878)5/15/2006 4:59:08 PM
From: BUGGI-WORespond to of 275872
 
@Eracer - Power Consumption
When will everybody end up to compare Mobile with plain
desktop stuff?

BTW: the load numbers are high - look here - 2xPrime ->
100% load = 86W für X2-4800+

lostcircuits.com

Also the idle numbers are WAY to high when they have C&Q
on, otherwise the comp. is bullshit, as often ...

BTW:
theinquirer.net

BUGGI



To: eracer who wrote (196878)5/15/2006 7:42:48 PM
From: PetzRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Yes, but the 4800+ won 23 benchmarks and the Core Duo won 3. I would guess that a 3800+ would have been equal to it in performance and a DC 1.8 GHz Turion X2 would have been equal in performance and equal in power consumption.

PS - the power measurement missed the 7 watts for the chipset and a few watts from Vio power. And after just looking at the chipset spec, the chipset may have been thermally throttling when running BURN.

Petz


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News