Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hans de Vries who wrote (196931)	5/15/2006 6:40:54 PM
From: dougSF30	Respond to of 275872

Here's a further blurb about Intel's 45nm process: Bohr also told Reg Hardware the 45nm chips require 30 per cent less transistor switching power than 65nm parts do. Sacrificing the 5x leakage power reduction yields transistors that deliver a 20 per cent improvement in switching speed, he added. So I take it that's a dynamic power reduction of 30%, along with (either) 5x reduction in static leakage or 20% faster switching speed. Or is it: (same speed, with 30% less dyn, 5x less static) OR (20% faster with neither dyn nor static improvements)... reghardware.co.uk