Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : FREE AMERICA -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sully- who wrote (6147)	5/15/2006 10:40:01 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 14758

Amendment IV The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. That does NOT make the distinctions you need. If the question is monitoring calls one of which is in a foreign country, I see no problem. If noth ends are in the UJS, you need a warrant. Period. Or do prefer simply trashing the Constitution? Between Bush's failed attempt to calm the immigration waters tonight and this, you had best get ready for a revolt in November. And that may mean an impeachment or two. This is where the rubber meets the road. I wanted a REPUBLICAN, not a dictator.