Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LoneClone who wrote (11368)	5/16/2006 1:17:12 PM
From: E. Charters	Respond to of 78417

The way to compare the performance of correlational software against a database, is to evaluate it in reference to the performance of the causitive factors as assigned to LGM analogues. LGM is more positive in assigning relative factors with a greater confidence level in that it allows a priori constructs of causitive factors which best fit the dependent variables. If for instance you have a trend in a disease that is difficult to assign to a vector, the LGM allow you to assign, parameter-like, a potential vector to the trend, develop formulae which allows matches to the possible evolution of the missing or unobserved vector that satisfy the trend in the disease. The characteristics of the vector and its observability are up to the molecular biologists to synthesize and discover. You can remember the term LGM by the mnemonic, "Little Green Men". "Murphy was an Irishman (and Murphy is a classic Irish surname), and Ireland=green": Green organ in body is gallbladder, so Murphy's point is the gall bladder. EC<:-}