SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mishedlo who wrote (51307)5/16/2006 11:37:02 PM
From: TH  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
mish,

I too am a fan of applying Occams Razor.

Also, my position is not that is was impossible to make the shots from the book depository. That was certainly possible. I'm a very skilled shot, and I am certain I could have done it had I had time to sight in the rifle.

Two facts stand in the way of the explanations that you have offered. Witnesses excluded from the Warren Commission report indicated that shots were fired from the grassy knoll. In the chaos following the shooting, it would be a very simple matter for one, two, or more to escape.

The big fact is that actual photos of JFK's head are inconsistent with a projectile from the rear.

Was Oswald a nutjob? Probably, and that made him the perfect choice for king pasty of the 20th century. Blackhawk Ben is king patsy for the 21st <g>

We will never solve this, but I think the number of motivated parties interested in the termination of JFK makes for a mighty long list.

And last, and most damning, is the magic bullet. Magic crock of crap is more like it. One talented bullet. That "theory" alone is enough to completely dismiss the Warren Commission Report as flawed. No one wants to acknowledge a coup d'etat on American soil. Why, its unamerican to even think it<g>

GT
TH



To: mishedlo who wrote (51307)5/17/2006 3:11:36 AM
From: patron_anejo_por_favor  Respond to of 116555
 
The problem with your friends test is that they were shooting at a stationary target, therefore there was not the issue of target acquisition using a scope while operating the bolt (twice) within 6 seconds. Not as easy by far as their test....

I personally think Oswald may have been involved, along with other teams of shooters. I have serious doubts that he fired the fatal shot.



To: mishedlo who wrote (51307)5/17/2006 4:17:27 PM
From: enrico99  Respond to of 116555
 
"Occam's razor" - doesn't it sound so much better than "Keep it simple, stupid" ?