SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LLCF who wrote (51381)5/17/2006 12:31:59 PM
From: Broken_Clock  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116555
 
Anyone could see? I would suggest that experts opinion is slightly more valued than "anyone could see". LOL!



To: LLCF who wrote (51381)5/17/2006 1:16:26 PM
From: Think4Yourself  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116555
 
And besides, it wasn't JUST from jet fuel burning. Immediately before the fire there was an impact from an object weighing well over a hundred tons hitting at several hundred miles per hour. It's not like the fire was burning in a building that otherwise had integrity. WTC towers would probably have been torn down anyways due to structural concerns.



To: LLCF who wrote (51381)5/17/2006 11:30:28 PM
From: bela_ghoulashi  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116555
 
The beauty and the remarkable horror of the internet is the window it opens into the bizarre dysfunctional thought processes of so goddam many people.

The towers collapsed from the top down. Controlled demolitions are started from the bottom. Anyone who has ever seen one in real life or on video knows this.

science.howstuffworks.com