Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (288368)	5/17/2006 7:26:12 PM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1570818

re: ANY US president would have reacted to 9/11 by going after bin Laden. With what? Special forces and covert ops, like Stephanopolous was suggesting? With focus, not another (neo) agenda. Remember Rumsfeld saying there were not any "good targets" in Afghanistan? REALITY: bin Laden did it, NOT Saddam Hussein. We spent out resources and got the wrong guy. For God sakes why can't you see that simple fact? If we got bin Laden and 10,000 US troops got killed in the process, you wouldn't hear a peep from me. re: Gore would have hesitated before taking out the Taliban. Who knows, certainly not you. The Taliban didn't fly planes into the WTC. Maybe Gore would have talked them into turning over bin Laden and his ilk, and they would all be dead by now... and Saddam Hussein would still be a broken down dictator... the result of the actions of a few good US Presidents.